2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferencias entre el control clínico y ambulatorio de la hipertensión arterial en pacientes muy ancianos. Proyecto CARDIORISC–MAPAPRES

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical characteristics of the 204 analyzed individuals (including ABPM records) matched with those described in several reports published by the Spanish CARDIOSRISK/MAPAPRES Group but some points should be highlighted. First, in our group of individuals, we found a high percentage of riser patterns (20%), 2-fold higher than that described in the MAPAPRES study (10%) [15]. This marked difference could be due to the number of individuals included in our study (n=204) compared with the number evaluated in the CARDIOSRISK/MAPAPRESSTUDY (n = 38,000).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinical characteristics of the 204 analyzed individuals (including ABPM records) matched with those described in several reports published by the Spanish CARDIOSRISK/MAPAPRES Group but some points should be highlighted. First, in our group of individuals, we found a high percentage of riser patterns (20%), 2-fold higher than that described in the MAPAPRES study (10%) [15]. This marked difference could be due to the number of individuals included in our study (n=204) compared with the number evaluated in the CARDIOSRISK/MAPAPRESSTUDY (n = 38,000).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…In addition for all patients > 1 month had elapsed between measurements of office BP and HBPM. Also, valid and reliable BP and HBPM information, complete data on all variables required for analysis of ABPM, as defined by the MAPAPRES protocol, was available for patients enrolled in the study [15]. The reasons for ordering an ABPM were stated on the order form and included six optional answers: 1) to evaluate efficacy of treatment; 2) to detect white coat syndrome; 3) to analyze high risk hypertension; 4) to define circadian rhythm; 5) to identify refractory hypertension; or 6) to observe labile hypertension.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Por otro lado, la principal limitació n del estudio es la falta de realizació n de una monitorizació n ambulatoria de la presió n arterial (MAPA) para confirmar el diagnó stico de HTA. Un reciente estudio realizado en nuestro país en pacientes muy ancianos refuerza los beneficios de utilizar la MAPA para las evaluaciones de la PA en el paciente hipertenso de edad muy avanzada 25 . Otra limitació n es la ú nica medida de PA realizada al inicio del estudio así como la falta de registro de los cambios en la salud, estado funcional y medicació n antihipertensiva durante los 4 añ os de seguimiento.…”
Section: Tablaunclassified
“…También cabe recordar que aunque es bien conocido que a medida que aumenta el número de MAPA realizadas en un sujeto determinado se reduce la prevalencia del patrón no dipper 9 , se optó por realizar una sola monitorización al tratarse de un grupo de sujetos frágiles de edad muy avanzada. Un reciente estudio realizado en nuestro país en pacientes muy ancianos refuerza los beneficios de utilizar la MAPA para las evaluaciones de la PA en el paciente hipertenso de edad muy avanzada 30 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified