2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferencias entre cirugía en bloque y enucleación en el tratamiento del sarcoma retroperitoneal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for LGFMS, with wide en bloc surgical resection being the most effective [5, 19] and enucleation, which was performed, being optimal for eliminating functional impairment of the anal sphincter muscle. We performed no adjuvant treatments because such practices to LGFMS are not conventional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for LGFMS, with wide en bloc surgical resection being the most effective [5, 19] and enucleation, which was performed, being optimal for eliminating functional impairment of the anal sphincter muscle. We performed no adjuvant treatments because such practices to LGFMS are not conventional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En bloc resection of the tumour including adjacent organs is the only curative treatment for RPS, negative margins being the main prognostic factor (IV B) [ 59 ]. Post-operative radiation is an option in highly selected patients with well-defined target regions (IV B) [ 60 ].…”
Section: Therapeutic Considerations For Specific Sts Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El tratamiento de estos tumores es la resección quirúrgica con márgenes oncológicos, ya que en caso de pasar por tumor la recidiva es la regla. Esto último, junto al subtipo histológico y su grado de diferenciación, son los principales factores pronósticos de sobrevida (6).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified