2007
DOI: 10.1676/06-101.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diets of Breeding Southwestern Willow Flycatchers in Different Habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continued presence of Tamarix could even enhance the habitat quality of these sites, as well as propagule island restoration sites, because its architectural structure seems useful for encouraging site choice by this and other avian species. Furthermore, SWFL feed on a wide range of arthropods in approximate proportion to their occurrence (Wiesenborn and Heydon 2007), so food resources would also enhanced by availability of larval and adult Diorhabda (Longland and Dudley 2008).…”
Section: Post-biocontrol Vegetation Composition Of Native Plants and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continued presence of Tamarix could even enhance the habitat quality of these sites, as well as propagule island restoration sites, because its architectural structure seems useful for encouraging site choice by this and other avian species. Furthermore, SWFL feed on a wide range of arthropods in approximate proportion to their occurrence (Wiesenborn and Heydon 2007), so food resources would also enhanced by availability of larval and adult Diorhabda (Longland and Dudley 2008).…”
Section: Post-biocontrol Vegetation Composition Of Native Plants and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii [Audubon]; Passeriformes: Tyrannidae) is a migratory bird that breeds in riparian habitat and captures aerial insects while flying and hovering (Sedgwick 2000). Diptera were the most-frequent insects eaten by willow flycatchers in southern Nevada and western Arizona, comprising 39% of prey and composed of a variety of families including Tabanidae and Dolichopodidae (Wiesenborn & Heydon 2007). Strongflying Odonata, both dragonflies and damselflies, also were eaten by willow flycatchers with the former likely contributing a large proportion of diet biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strongflying Odonata, both dragonflies and damselflies, also were eaten by willow flycatchers with the former likely contributing a large proportion of diet biomass. Coleoptera, arthropods categorized as weak-fliers with the lowest P concentrations, comprised 9.5% of prey (Wiesenborn & Heydon 2007). Insectivorous birds like flycatchers that expend greater energy by capturing prey in flight …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, nothing is known about the palatability or nutritional value of tamarisk beetles for riparian birds. Although coleopterans constitute a significant portion of the diet of many southwestern riparian birds (Drost et al 2003, Yard et al 2004, Wiesenborn and Heydon 2007, Durst et al 2008a, the tamarisk beetle is a member of the family Chrysomelidae, which produce secondary chemicals distasteful to some birds (Hilker andKöpf 1994, Rowell-Rahier et al 1995), so it may be less palatable than other coleopterans.…”
Section: No Change In Bird Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%