2022
DOI: 10.1590/1678-992x-2019-0257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary net energy mainly affects growth performance and pork quality of finishing pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is worth noting that, although just numerically, pigs given the high energy diet ate less feed (p = 0.10) than the other groups, this being especially observed during the grower period (from around 80 to 110 kg BW; p = 0.04). The negative relationship between dietary energy level and feed consumption in pigs has also been found by other authors [8,28], and it is justified because pigs adjust their voluntary feed intake to maintain a constant daily energy intake [29]. Regardless the lack of effect of low-CP and -AA diet on ADG and ADFI in comparison to the control diet, it corroborates the results of Knowles et al [25], although Suárez-Belloch et al [30] reported a lower ADG and ADFI when a greater reduction of dietary CP and AA was applied (from 17.2 to 10.6% CP and from 0.77 to 0.42% lysine).…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, it is worth noting that, although just numerically, pigs given the high energy diet ate less feed (p = 0.10) than the other groups, this being especially observed during the grower period (from around 80 to 110 kg BW; p = 0.04). The negative relationship between dietary energy level and feed consumption in pigs has also been found by other authors [8,28], and it is justified because pigs adjust their voluntary feed intake to maintain a constant daily energy intake [29]. Regardless the lack of effect of low-CP and -AA diet on ADG and ADFI in comparison to the control diet, it corroborates the results of Knowles et al [25], although Suárez-Belloch et al [30] reported a lower ADG and ADFI when a greater reduction of dietary CP and AA was applied (from 17.2 to 10.6% CP and from 0.77 to 0.42% lysine).…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%