2020
DOI: 10.3233/jad-191181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Lactoferrin Supplementation Prevents Memory Impairment and Reduces Amyloid-β Generation in J20 Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our surprise, we observed no protective effects of 16 weeks' Lf intervention on cognitive function from both the young and middle-aged APP/PS1 mice; we further demonstrated that almost no key markers involved in Aβ metabolism (IDE, ADAM10, BACE1, and cathepsin B), tau phosphorylation (p-tau ser396&404), neuro-inflammation (GFAP and Ibα1), and synaptic plasticity (BDNF and PSD95) were altered post Lf intervention for both young and middle-aged APP/PS1 mice. This is also contradictory to the studies by Abdelhamid et al (31) and Guo et al (8). We postulate that the following reasons might explain the absence of beneficial effects of Lf on cognition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our surprise, we observed no protective effects of 16 weeks' Lf intervention on cognitive function from both the young and middle-aged APP/PS1 mice; we further demonstrated that almost no key markers involved in Aβ metabolism (IDE, ADAM10, BACE1, and cathepsin B), tau phosphorylation (p-tau ser396&404), neuro-inflammation (GFAP and Ibα1), and synaptic plasticity (BDNF and PSD95) were altered post Lf intervention for both young and middle-aged APP/PS1 mice. This is also contradictory to the studies by Abdelhamid et al (31) and Guo et al (8). We postulate that the following reasons might explain the absence of beneficial effects of Lf on cognition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…For example, Carro et al (30) reported that healthy individuals with low salivary lactoferrin levels had a higher likelihood (more than 77%) of developing AD. Lf administration (orally or intranasally) could improve cognitive function in both AD patients (7), APP/PS1 mice (8) and AβPP (J20) mice (31). Our study was the very first to explore whether Lf intervention on cognition might be age-dependent by using both the young and middle-aged APP/PS1 mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A similar mechanism in which amyloidogenic processing of APP is modulated by neuroinflammation requires interferon-induced transmembrane 3 to potentiate γ-secretase activity [ 60 ]. Lf elevation in response to a microbial insult may offer a mechanistic connection between an innate immune response and Aβ production as well as explain some of the acute protective mechanisms reported for Lf in AD [ 61 , 62 ]. However, sustained production of Aβ under chronic Lf produced by the AD-related microgliosis (also potentially receiving contributions from astrocytosis or peripheral plasma) [ 31 ] may lead to Aβ deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the intensity and number of LF-positive depositions increased with age. The up-regulation of LF in the brains of both AD patients and transgenic mice with AD indicated an important protective role for LF in infected AD-brain tissue [53]. It is tempting to speculate that the high consumption of LF in AD could lead to reduced LF levels over time, particularly when AD is promoted by long-term chronic infection.…”
Section: Low Salivary Lactoferrin Could Promote Transfer Of Oral Bacteria and Tissue Inflammatory Mediators To The Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%