2008
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200700112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary intake and risk evaluation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in The Netherlands

Abstract: The current study aims at estimating the dietary intake of PBDEs in the Netherlands and evaluating the resultant risk. Dietary intake was estimated using results of PBDE analyses in Dutch food products from 2003/2004 and consumption data of the third Dutch National Food Consumption Survey (1997/1998). Assuming that non-detects represent levels of half the detection limit, the median long-term intake of the Dutch population of the sum of five major PBDEs (namely PBDEs 47, 99, 100, 153+154) is 0.79 ng/kg body we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
60
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
60
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All other food groups analysed did not contain PBDEs above the analytical limit of detection (LOD) and were therefore not modelled. This finding is supported by Bakker et al (2008), who reported that exposure to PBDEs from foods other than of animal origin was restricted to a maximum of 10-15% of total PBDE exposure from food. Schecter et al (2010) considered the influence of foods other than of animal origin (here vegetable products) to be even smaller (around 2% of the total dose).…”
Section: Input Parameterssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All other food groups analysed did not contain PBDEs above the analytical limit of detection (LOD) and were therefore not modelled. This finding is supported by Bakker et al (2008), who reported that exposure to PBDEs from foods other than of animal origin was restricted to a maximum of 10-15% of total PBDE exposure from food. Schecter et al (2010) considered the influence of foods other than of animal origin (here vegetable products) to be even smaller (around 2% of the total dose).…”
Section: Input Parameterssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To put the Irish dose estimates into perspective, they are compared with doses presented in other studies (Table 5) (Bocio et al, 2003;Harrad et al, 2004;Gomara et al, 2006;UKFSA, 2006b;Voorspoels et al, 2007;Akutsu et al, 2008a;Bakker et al, 2008;Sioen et al, 2008;Schecter et al, 2010). We also present external doses (i.e., before uptake into the body) to make our estimates better comparable with other studies (for detailed results see Supplementary Table S11 and Table S12).…”
Section: Comparison Of Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knutsen et al (2005) combined concentrations from a market-basket survey with a comprehensive food consumption survey to estimate a mean daily adult exposure of 62.5 ng/day for Norweigans. Bakker et al (2006) also combined food consumption data with composite food data to find a median dietary intake of 0.79 ng/kg/day for the Netherlands, with a 95% of 1.62 ng/kg/day, dominated by dairy and fish at 39% and 28%, respectively. An estimate of 51 ng/day was derived for diet only for the Swedish general adult population (Darnerud et al, 2001).…”
Section: Exposure Intake Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in the study of Bakker et al (Bakker et al, 2008), where the dietary intake of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the Dutch population was being investigated, only food groups suspected of being affected by the contamination were included in the study. Such studies are better classified as TDS-like investigations.…”
Section: Deviations From a Typical Tds Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%