2015
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary input of microbes and host genetic variation shape among-population differences in stickleback gut microbiota

Abstract: To explain differences in gut microbial communities we must determine how processes regulating microbial community assembly (colonization, persistence) differ among hosts and affect microbiota composition. We surveyed the gut microbiota of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from 10 geographically clustered populations and sequenced environmental samples to track potential colonizing microbes and quantify the effects of host environment and genotype. Gut microbiota composition and diversity varied … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

30
279
3
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(72 reference statements)
30
279
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a high variation in sequence number obtained for different samples as described previously [48]. To allow comparison of disparate libraries, normalization of sequence number is achieved by random selection of sequences referred to as rarefaction [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The effect of this process on beta diversity has been demonstrated [56][57][58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We observed a high variation in sequence number obtained for different samples as described previously [48]. To allow comparison of disparate libraries, normalization of sequence number is achieved by random selection of sequences referred to as rarefaction [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The effect of this process on beta diversity has been demonstrated [56][57][58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bayesian community-level source tracking, a computational approach, was developed to estimate the ratio of the gut microbes potentially obtained from water or prey source in their habitat [21, 37]. However, the contribution of environmental and indigenous gut microbes to gut microbiota in animals facing external environmental change has not been previously investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This somewhat parallel pattern in Streptococcus abundance between the catfish intestinal microbiota and the microbiota of the associated diet samples suggests that diet may have introduced this OTU to the gut microbiota, which could be useful when considering effective routes of probiotic supplementation. Similarly, Smith and coworkers showed that differences in diet-derived microbes associated with the prey items of geographically separate populations of three-spine stickleback partially explained the differences detected in gut microbiota across the various populations [75]. Although when employing sequence based analysis, discerning if OTUs were detected as transient diet-derived microbial DNA artifacts or as viable functioning members of the gut microbiota is difficult and would require further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%