1996
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.7.1795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Guidelines for Healthy American Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
97
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the positive linear trend between saturated fat intake and LDL cholesterol, there is a consensus among international nutrition panels that saturated fat intakes should be kept as low as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet (31,44) . In the present evaluation, all but one of the average daily intakes based on Ireland's food pyramid advice exceeded the previous international recommendations for saturated fat (#10 % energy from saturated fat) (45)(46)(47) . The National Food Consumption Surveys have found that only 6 % of children (5-12 years), 11 % of teenagers (13-17 years) and 21 % of adults (18-64 years) reached this #10 % saturated fat goal (42) , which is less stringent than the current recommendation to keep saturated fat intakes 'as low as possible' (31) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Due to the positive linear trend between saturated fat intake and LDL cholesterol, there is a consensus among international nutrition panels that saturated fat intakes should be kept as low as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet (31,44) . In the present evaluation, all but one of the average daily intakes based on Ireland's food pyramid advice exceeded the previous international recommendations for saturated fat (#10 % energy from saturated fat) (45)(46)(47) . The National Food Consumption Surveys have found that only 6 % of children (5-12 years), 11 % of teenagers (13-17 years) and 21 % of adults (18-64 years) reached this #10 % saturated fat goal (42) , which is less stringent than the current recommendation to keep saturated fat intakes 'as low as possible' (31) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The values within this range (22 -40%) are considerably lower than average values (49% energy) in Western diets (McDowell et al, 1994), or recommended (55 -60% or more of total energy) healthful values (Krauss et al, 1996). Although current advice to reduce risk of CVD is, in general, to replace saturated fats with carbohydrate (Krauss et al, 1996), there is mounting evidence to indicated that low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets may elicit undesirable blood lipid changes, including reductions in HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-1, while concurrently elevating TG, VLDL cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol (Denke & Breslow, 1988;Dreon et al, 1995;Jeppesen et al, 1997;Mensink & Katan, 1992).…”
Section: Dietary Carbohydratementioning
confidence: 73%
“…The values within this range (22 -40%) are considerably lower than average values (49% energy) in Western diets (McDowell et al, 1994), or recommended (55 -60% or more of total energy) healthful values (Krauss et al, 1996). Although current advice to reduce risk of CVD is, in general, to replace saturated fats with carbohydrate (Krauss et al, 1996), there is mounting evidence to indicated that low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets may elicit undesirable blood lipid changes, including reductions in HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-1, while concurrently elevating TG, VLDL cholesterol and small dense LDL cholesterol (Denke & Breslow, 1988;Dreon et al, 1995;Jeppesen et al, 1997;Mensink & Katan, 1992). Because of these untoward blood lipid changes, substitution of MUFA for saturated fats has been suggested as a more effective strategy than substitution of carbohydrate for saturated fats in order to lower total and LDL serum cholesterol concentrations without adversely influencing HDL, VLDL, TG and apoprotein A-1 (Grundy, 1986;Mensink & Katan, 1987;Wahrburg et al, 1992).…”
Section: Dietary Carbohydratementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although there is no clear evidence demonstrating that salt restriction reduces the incidence of hypertension in normotensive people, there is general agreement that it can improve blood pressure in hypertensive individuals, particularly those aged more than 44 y (Midgley et al, 1996;Fodor et al, 1999). The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends 6 g/day (2400 mg of sodium) as a 'prudent and safe' limit for the daily intake of sodium chloride (Krauss et al, 1996), but this is abundantly exceeded in all of our clusters, particularly the 'big eaters', whose diet is also highly atherogenic and highly caloric (greater risk of obesity). These subjects should therefore be the primary target for interventions aimed at lowering blood pressure and preventing coronary heart disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%