Dietary generalists and nutritional specialists: Feeding strategies of adult female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya

Abstract

Generalist primates eat many food types and shift their diet with changes in food availability. Variation in foods eaten may not, however, match variation in nutrient intake. We examined dietary variation in a generalist-feeder, the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis), to see how dietary food intake related to variation in available food and nutrient intake. We used 371 all-day focal follows from 24 adult females (three groups) in a wild rainforest population to quantify daily diet over 9 months. We measured food availability using vegetation surveys and phenology monitoring. We analyzed >700 food and fecal samples for macronutrient content. Subjects included 445 food items (species-specific plant parts and insect morphotypes) in their diet.Variation in fruit consumption (percentage of diet and total kcal) tracked variation in availability, suggesting fruit was a preferred food type. Fruits also constituted the majority of the diet (by calories) and some fruit species were eaten more than expected based on relative availability. In contrast, few species of young leaves were eaten more than expected. Also, subjects ate fewer young leaves (based on calories consumed) when fruit or young leaves were more available, suggesting that young leaves served as fallback foods. Despite the broad range of foods in the diet, group differences in fiber digestibility, and variation that reflected food availability, subjects and groups converged on similar nutrient intakes (grand mean ± SD: 637.1 ± 104.7 kcal overall energy intake, 293.3 ± 46.9 kcal nonstructural carbohydrate, 147.8 ± 72.4 kcal lipid, 107.8 ± 12.9 kcal available protein, and 88.1 ± 17.5 kcal structural carbohydrate; N = 24 subjects). Thus, blue monkeys appear to be food composition generalists and nutrient intake specialists, using flexible feeding strategies to regulate nutrient intake. Findings highlight the importance of simultaneously examining dietary composition at both levels of foods and nutrients to understand primate feeding ecology. K E Y W O R D S guenon, multidimensional nutritional niche, nutritional ecology SUPPORTING INFORMATION Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section. How to cite this article: Takahashi MQ, Rothman JM, Raubenheimer D, Cords M. Dietary generalists and nutritional specialists: Feeding strategies of adult female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Am J

The geometry of resource constraint: An empirical study of the golden snub‐nosed monkey

“…Felton, Felton, Raubenheimer, et al (2009) found that spider monkeys Ateles chamek observed across different phenological periods (seasons) in Bolivia maintained protein intake constant, while allowing NPE to vary with variation in the P:NPE ratio of the diet. The same pattern was observed in blue monkeys Cercopithecus mitis in Kenya (Takahashi et al, 2019), small‐bodied lemurs Lepilemur leucopus in Madagascar (Droscher et al., 2016) and chimpanzees in Uganda (Uwimbimbazi et al, accepted).…”

Living in the suburbs: Space use by vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) in an eco‐estate, South Africa

“…Horrocks and Baulu's () study also showed preferences for modified habitats and non‐natural foods. Similarly, Takahashi's () study showed clear preferential use by two troops for human‐modified habitat and the non‐natural food resources it provided. One study troop's daily intake of natural foods outweighed that of the other troops, with habitat differences between the home ranges playing an important factor.…”

“…In general, larger groups demand larger movement to obtain food resources (Clutton‐Brock & Harvey, ; Borries, Larney, Lu, Ossi & Koenig, ; Pasternak et al, ). However, Takahashi's () study showed group size to be unrelated to movement, with the avoidance of within‐group scramble competition over food being a more important impact on daily foraging movement. Additionally, troop movements correlated with adjustments in diet in response to seasonal food availability within the environment, with regular use of non‐natural, high‐carbohydrate foods found in human‐modified habitats.…”

“…However, troop size was shown not to correlate with day range length in Pata's monkeys ( Erythrocebus patas ; Chism & Rowell, ), blue monkeys ( Cercopithecus mitis ; Butynski, ), black and white colobus ( Colobus guereza ; Fashing, ), red‐tail monkeys ( Cercopithecus ascanius ; Struhsaker & Leland, ), western chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes verus ; Lehmann & Boesch, ), kipunji ( Rungwecebus kipunji ; De Luca, Picton Phillipps, Machaga, & Davenport, ) and several Asian colobine species (Yeager & Kool, ). Takahashi () examined the nutritional ecology of adult, female C. mitis in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Daily path length was not related to group size, with comparison to previous dietary studies showing study groups moving into new areas and habitats capitalised on the new food resources, strengthening their position as flexible feeders.…”

Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?

“…This could also be facilitated by improving the precision of data collection methods on wild primates through more targeted observational techniques (Melin et al, 2018;Nakagawa, 2009) or the use of technology, such as wearable sensors (Fehlmann et al, 2017;Watanabe & Takahashi, 2014), to capture behaviors related to energy intakes, such as bit rate and foraging behaviors. These techniques could be combined with the experimental presentation of controlled food patches (Marshall et al, 2013), through analyses of wild food patches using geographic information systems (GIS) (Shaffer, 2013), or through detailed nutritional analyses of wild foods (Conklin-Brittain et al, 1998;Johnson et al, 2017;Takahashi et al, 2019;Uwimbabazi et al, 2019). By building knowledge of individual-level foraging strategies, we can gain greater insight into the drivers of primate foraging behavior, better identify when individuals adjust their behavior due to social, ecological, or other constraints, and more accurately estimate the costs individuals experience by foraging in different social and ecological environments.…”