The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary exclusions for established atopic eczema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main characteristics of the trials are shown in Table 1. Additional details on methods, interventions and data extraction appear in a more extensive table in the Cochrane review (11) which also lists the three excluded studies and reasons for exclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main characteristics of the trials are shown in Table 1. Additional details on methods, interventions and data extraction appear in a more extensive table in the Cochrane review (11) which also lists the three excluded studies and reasons for exclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) and ISI Web of Science (last search March 2006). The full search strategy has been published elsewhere (11). References from published studies were checked for further trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Exclusion diets for children with AD may consist of the removal of individual single foods; removal of common allergens such as eggs, milk, wheat, nuts, soy and fish; a ‘few foods diet’ (quite a restricted diet); or an elemental diet (elemental formula only). A 2008 Cochrane review found insufficient evidence to support egg‐ and milk‐free diets, elemental or few foods diets in unselected participants with AD 38 . The review identified a total of nine randomised controlled trials that were considered suitable for meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Exclusion Diets For Admentioning
confidence: 99%