2018
DOI: 10.1002/mcf2.10019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Composition and Trophic Niche Partitioning of Spotty‐bellied Greenlings Hexagrammos agrammus, Fat Greenlings H. otakii, Korean Rockfish Sebastes schlegelii, and Japanese Seaperch Lateolabrax japonicus in the Yellow Sea Revealed by Stomach Content Analysis and Stable Isotope Analysis

Abstract: Stable nitrogen and carbon isotope ratios of fish tissues, in combination with stomach content analysis, provide insights into how energy flows through marine food webs. Using these techniques, we investigated the diets and trophic niches of four important fish species of the Yellow Sea: the Spotty‐bellied Greenling Hexagrammos agrammus, Fat Greenling H. otakii, Korean Rockfish Sebastes schlegelii, and Japanese Seaperch Lateolabrax japonicus. The stomach content analysis revealed that Spotty‐bellied Greenlings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Decapods were observed to be most selected for by H. otakii at both sites, even though proportion of the diet represented by prey items within this category varied by habitat types, while S. schlegelii displayed a largely dependence of Gobiidae and Blenniidae irrelevant to habitat types. Our result is consistent with previous studies on trophic ecology of H. otakii and S. schlegelii, reporting that these two species were both shrimp and fish feeders, where H. otakii preyed more on Decapod while S. schlegelii relied more on teleosts (Kwak et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Interspecific and Spatial Differences On Diet Compositionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Decapods were observed to be most selected for by H. otakii at both sites, even though proportion of the diet represented by prey items within this category varied by habitat types, while S. schlegelii displayed a largely dependence of Gobiidae and Blenniidae irrelevant to habitat types. Our result is consistent with previous studies on trophic ecology of H. otakii and S. schlegelii, reporting that these two species were both shrimp and fish feeders, where H. otakii preyed more on Decapod while S. schlegelii relied more on teleosts (Kwak et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Interspecific and Spatial Differences On Diet Compositionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on GCA, both species displayed diverse feeding choices, with at least 28 prey items identified in H. otakii and 21 in S. schlegelii, supporting the conclusion that they are opportunistic carnivorous predators (Wu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). Decapods were observed to be most selected for by H. otakii at both sites, even though proportion of the diet represented by prey items within this category varied by habitat types, while S. schlegelii displayed a largely dependence of Gobiidae and Blenniidae irrelevant to habitat types.…”
Section: Interspecific and Spatial Differences On Diet Compositionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Braga et al [3] stated that the fish feeding ecology is thoroughly linked to population dynamics and has important implications in the subjects of resource partitioning, habitat preferences, prey selection, interspecific competition, and energy transfer within the ecosystem. Niche overlap and partitioning should provide very useful information on how these species rank in the food web to derive implications for fisheries management [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%