2018
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary choices are influenced by genotype, mating status, and sex in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Mating causes many changes in physiology, behavior, and gene expression in a wide range of organisms. These changes are predicted to be sex specific, influenced by the divergent reproductive roles of the sexes. In female insects, mating is associated with an increase in egg production which requires high levels of nutritional input with direct consequences for the physiological needs of individual females. Consequently, females alter their nutritional acquisition in line with the physiological demands imposed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One observation we made is that the effects of Zol varied depending on time of administration, dose and sex differences that may be partly due to alternate drug uptake by males and females. In females, egg production requires higher levels of nutritional input than required by males, resulting in increased food consumption and, presumably, increased drug uptake (Camus, Huang, Reuter, & Fowler, 2018). By contrast, in the FPPS mutants, where the action of the enzyme is disrupted independently of drug uptake, similar lifespan extension is observed suggesting that the effect of mevalonate pathway inhibition on lifespan is unlikely to be sexually dimorphic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One observation we made is that the effects of Zol varied depending on time of administration, dose and sex differences that may be partly due to alternate drug uptake by males and females. In females, egg production requires higher levels of nutritional input than required by males, resulting in increased food consumption and, presumably, increased drug uptake (Camus, Huang, Reuter, & Fowler, 2018). By contrast, in the FPPS mutants, where the action of the enzyme is disrupted independently of drug uptake, similar lifespan extension is observed suggesting that the effect of mevalonate pathway inhibition on lifespan is unlikely to be sexually dimorphic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note, however, that the transcriptional profiles in that study were measured in the heads of virgin flies. Data on nutritional preference suggests that male and female dietary requirements, and hence presumably also their physiological states, are more similar in virgins than mated flies [11], which might also contribute to the concordant responses. Because we use mated flies for the experiments reported here, this caveat does not apply to the current study.…”
Section: A Shared Metabolic Core Transcriptomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These choices are further adapted to reflect the individual's current condition and reproductive investment [9,10]. For example, Camus et al [11] found that the female preference for protein in fruit flies was significantly higher in mated females (who require resources to produce eggs) than virgins, while the preferences of males (who start producing sperm before reaching sexual maturity) did not significantly differ between mated and virgin flies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drosophila melanogaster has been used as a model for nutritional physiology studies for many years (Piper, 2017;Rauser, Mueller, & Rose, 2004;Tatar, Post, & Yu, 2014), and their requirements for development and female reproduction are well studied (Begg & Robertson, 1950;Consuegra et al, 2019;Piper, 2017;Sang & King, 1961). We also know that the lifespan of male and female adults respond differently to dietary interventions and that the sexes show different preference in macronutrient balance (Bowman & Tatar, 2016;Camus, Huang, Reuter, & Fowler, 2018;Chandegra, Tang, Chi, & Alic, 2017;Lee, Kim, & Min, 2013;Magwere, Chapman, & Partridge, 2004;Regan et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2020), but no one has systematically determined the minimal requirements of each nutrient class for adult lifespan and whether these requirements differ between the sexes. Defining these limits is important since it is fundamental to understanding how adult-specific diet interventions, such as DR and DB, may be operating to modify lifespan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%