2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary and nutritional interventions in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic literature review

Abstract: Background Cerebral palsy is an extremely severe brain injury associated with multiple nutritional and clinical issues, such as underweight, gastroesophageal reflux, constipation, and nutrient deficiency. Evidence-based dietary and nutritional interventions may improve the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy. Aim Systematically review randomized clinical trials evaluating nutritional and dietary interventions in the clinical, nutritional, and neurodevelopmental aspects of children with cerebral p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early detection of cerebral palsy (CP) facilitates the investigation of therapy alternatives and early intervention aimed at improving intrinsic brain plasticity for better functional outcome [21] . The few randomised clinical trials on the application of nutritional therapies in children with cerebral palsy and the encouraging findings indicate a neglected field that could enhance the health and well-being of millions of families worldwide [22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early detection of cerebral palsy (CP) facilitates the investigation of therapy alternatives and early intervention aimed at improving intrinsic brain plasticity for better functional outcome [21] . The few randomised clinical trials on the application of nutritional therapies in children with cerebral palsy and the encouraging findings indicate a neglected field that could enhance the health and well-being of millions of families worldwide [22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%