1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(97)83022-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary and dining expectations of residents of long term care facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDP posits that individuals determine satisfaction by comparing their expectations regarding a product or service to their actual experience [ 55 ]. Accordingly, we drew upon research by Case and Gilbert who explored resident expectations regarding the food and dining experience during item generation [ 57 ]. The Importance-Performance Model (IPM) suggests that satisfaction is related to a combination of perceived importance and performance (quality) rather than expectations or values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EDP posits that individuals determine satisfaction by comparing their expectations regarding a product or service to their actual experience [ 55 ]. Accordingly, we drew upon research by Case and Gilbert who explored resident expectations regarding the food and dining experience during item generation [ 57 ]. The Importance-Performance Model (IPM) suggests that satisfaction is related to a combination of perceived importance and performance (quality) rather than expectations or values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the three factors are also consistent with previous research into food service satisfaction in this setting. Case and Gilbert suggest four themes contribute to resident satisfaction: (1) meal quality (taste, temperature, appearance); (2) individualization (adequate choice, access to familiar or culturally appropriate meals); (3) dining setting (décor, staffing, adequate assistance); and (4) socialization (ability to choose dining companion) [ 57 ]. Each of these themes are reflected in the FSSQ with Factor One addressing meal quality, Factor Two addressing food choice/availability and Factor Three consolidating the elements of dining setting and socialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For individuals living in institutions the ways in which food is provided and the environment associated with dining may be important in maximising patients' dietary intakes. Case & Gilbert (1997) have summarised the dining expectations of residents of long-term care facilities. The strategies that have been considered include: providing a pleasant atmosphere for dining (e.g.…”
Section: Environmental Changes (Including Music)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can monitor the consumption of meals for all residents or target those who have a higher risk for malnutrition, dehydration, and other nutrition-related outcomes. [12][13] The registered dietitian can determine if a resident's decreased intake is secondary to drug-nutrient interactions, changes in preferences, or changes in disease state. If drug-nutrient interactions occur, the dietitian may inform the pharmacist who can recommend medications and/or order appetite stimulants to counteract the possible negative outcomes produced by the interactions.…”
Section: "A Positive Dining Experience Should Foster Independence Promote Self-esteem and Make The Resident As Comfortable And Safe As Pomentioning
confidence: 99%