2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet variability and reproductive performance of macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus at Bird Island, South Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on 14 d nestling mass as an indicator of diet quality, diet diversity increased when feeding conditions were sub-optimal, supporting previous observations of seabird diet breadth in relation to reproductive success and other measures of breeding conditions (e.g. Takahashi et al 2001, Hedd et al 2006, Waluda et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on 14 d nestling mass as an indicator of diet quality, diet diversity increased when feeding conditions were sub-optimal, supporting previous observations of seabird diet breadth in relation to reproductive success and other measures of breeding conditions (e.g. Takahashi et al 2001, Hedd et al 2006, Waluda et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, macaroni penguins remain in more northerly waters (Ratcliffe et al 2014), and may compensate for the lower availability of fish by switching to a diet that is almost entirely composed of crustaceans. The diets of macaroni penguins are then potentially enriched in 15 N during the breeding season by the inclusion of myctophid and demersal fish species (Waluda et al 2012). The blood plasma samples that represented the pre-breeding season for males were similar to those observed for males during incubation and spanned part of the range observed for males during pre-moult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Altered activity budgets and diet switching in this population typically results from a reduction in local krill availability (Croxall et al 1999, Waluda et al 2010. The percentage of individuals with a diet dominated by krill (> 90% of a diet sample) was lower in 2002 compared to (42% in 2002Waluda et al 2012;60% in 2012;British Antarctic Survey unpubl. data).…”
Section: Individual Consistency and Intrapopulation Variation In Resomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This importance could be due to the component's role as an indicator of wider ecosystem state, its direct importance to ecosystem services, or its indirect importance via ecosystem structure and functioning (Zacharias & Roff 2001;Link 2010). For example, macaroni penguins in South Georgia seem to be sensitive indicators of krill availability (Waluda et al 2012) while mackerel icefish are both a harvested species and an important alternative prey that buffers some penguins and seals through krill shortages (Hill et al 2005). It is appropriate to present unaggregated results for the most important components (deYoung et al 2004;Hill et al 2006).…”
Section: S Hillmentioning
confidence: 99%