Diet of the brown bear in Himalaya: Combining classical and molecular genetic techniques

Abstract

The ecological requirements of brown bears are poorly known in the Himalaya region, which complicates conservation efforts. We documented the diet of the Himalayan brown bear (Ursus arctos isabellinus) by combining classical scat analysis and a newly developed molecular genetic technique (the trnL approach), in Deosai National Park, Pakistan. Brown bears consumed over 50 plant species, invertebrates, ungulates, and several rodents. Eight plant families; Poaceae, Polygonaceae, Cyperaceae, Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Caryophyllaceae, Lamiaceae, and Rubiaceae were commonly eaten with graminoids comprising the bulk of the diet. Golden marmots comprised the major mammalian biomass in the park, and were also the main meat source for bears. Animal matter, making 36% of dietary content, contributed half of the digestible energy, due to its higher nutritious value. We did not find a significant temporal pattern in diet, perhaps because the availability of the major diet (graminoids) did not change over the foraging period. Male brown bears were more carnivorous than females, probably because of their larger size, which requires higher energy and also makes them more efficient in capturing marmots. Frequencies of three plant species were also significantly higher in male brown bears; Bistorta affinis, Carex diluta, and Carex sp. Diet of the brown bear differed significantly between the park and surrounding valleys. In valleys, diet consisted predominantly of graminoids and crops, whereas the park provided more nutritious and diverse foodThe estimated digestible energy available to brown bears in Deosai was the lowest documented among brown bear populations, due to the lack of fruits and a relatively lower meat content. The low nutritious diet and high cost of metabolism in a high-altitude environment, probably explains the very low reproductive potential of this population.

Isolated Grauer’s gorilla populations differ in diet and gut microbiome

“…In addition to traditional methods based on direct observations and feeding traces, molecular approaches provide further opportunities to detect rare dietary items, revealing a more complete picture of cryptic and rare species' nutritional ecology (Ait Baamrane et al, 2012;Bradley et al, 2007;Goldberg et al, 2020;Hibert et al, 2013;Nawaz et al, 2019;Osman et al, 2020;Quéméré et al, 2013;Valentini et al, 2009). The approach is scalable to many individuals, is not biased towards habituated or approachable individuals, and provides data which can be compared across species (Kartzinel et al, 2019).…”

Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia

“…Therefore, to determine the CF 1 , we used the function y = 84.70 × x –0.96 provided by Hewitt and Robbins (1996), according to which our CF 1 was 3.23 for adult moose and 1.43 for calves. We used these correction factors as 3.0 and 1.5, respectively, to be in accordance with other studies (Persson et al 2001, Ciucci et al 2014, Lopez-Alfaro et al 2015, Coogan et al 2018, Nawaz et al 2019). It is important to note that we found the remains of only one calf, so in most cases we used a CF 1 = 3.…”

Influence of predator suppression and prey availability on carnivore occurrence in western Himalaya

“…Bears in this landscape are known to be omnivores. Since we could not quantify the distribution of all the animal and plant species that they depend upon, we did not build a model of bears and prey interaction (Nawaz et al, 2019). SIF, or the degree of cooccurrence between two species, is given by:…”