1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00002737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet of alewives, Alosa pseudoharengus and blueback herring, A. aestivalis (Pisces: Clupeidae) in Minas Basin, Nova Scotia, a turbid, macrotidal estuary

Abstract: SynopsisStomach contents of anadromous alewives, Afosa pseudohurengus and blueback herring, A. aestivalis, obtained from brush weir and drift net collections in Minas Basin, N.S., were examined. Diets showed much overlap in terms of resource use, but the dietary importance of major prey categories differed substantially between species. Alewives favoured larger, more benthic prey (e.g. amphipods, mysids and crangonids), while blueback herring appeared to concentrate their feeding on microzooplankters (e.g. cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). In contrast, Rainbow Smelt ate large amounts and Alewives consumed moderate amounts of seven‐spine bay shrimp (Stone and Daborn ; Lecomte and Dodson ; this study), which is consistent with the near‐bottom distribution of these two fishes during daylight hours. It is unclear why Alewives and Rainbow Smelt differed so greatly in their consumption of seven‐spine bay shrimp given that the stomach samples often came from fish collected in the same fishing sets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…). In contrast, Rainbow Smelt ate large amounts and Alewives consumed moderate amounts of seven‐spine bay shrimp (Stone and Daborn ; Lecomte and Dodson ; this study), which is consistent with the near‐bottom distribution of these two fishes during daylight hours. It is unclear why Alewives and Rainbow Smelt differed so greatly in their consumption of seven‐spine bay shrimp given that the stomach samples often came from fish collected in the same fishing sets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Three pelagic species (American Shad, Atlantic Herring, and Atlantic Mackerel) only consumed small amounts of seven-spine bay shrimp, consistent with the shrimp remaining close to the bottom during daylight hours (Heck et al 1989;Joseph et al 2006;Brown et al 2014). In contrast, Rainbow Smelt ate large amounts and Alewives consumed moderate amounts of seven-spine bay shrimp (Stone and Daborn 1987;Lecomte and Dodson 2005; this study), which is consistent with the near-bottom distribution of these two fishes during daylight hours. It is unclear why Alewives and Rainbow Smelt differed so greatly in their consumption of seven-spine bay shrimp given that the stomach samples often came from fish collected in the same fishing sets.…”
Section: Key Preysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…fallax se différencient. La plupart des études sur les habitudes alimentaires des espèces qui coexistent dans un même espace assume que la compétition est évitée par la consommation de proies différentes (STONE et DABORN, 1987). La disponibilité en proies potentielles présentes dans les aires de chasse, corrélées aux adaptations éco-éthologiques que les aloses peuvent manifester lors de la collecte de leur nourriture, sont à l'origine de la composition des régimes alimentaires observés.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Crecco & Blake (1983) found that shad and herring larvae competed for a cladoceran during one period in their development, but that competition was likely reduced by selection of different sized prey, a consequence of differences in mouth morphology. Stone & Daborn (1987), working in a polyhaline estuary, found that, at age 1, alewives were more dependent upon benthic prey and herrings upon plankton; older alosids had more similar diets as benthic prey predominated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%