2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00291-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet Interviews of Subject Pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Foster et al [1] reported both exact match (80%) and approximate match rates (1.3%) between INTAKE24 and an interviewer-led 24HDR among adolescents (11–16 years) and young adults (17–24 years), while omissions (10.7%) and intrusions (7.1%) were also similar to the present study. Interestingly, female participants had higher incidence of matches between both recalls, where male participants were more likely to omit food and drink items, which has also been reported in other studies [22]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Foster et al [1] reported both exact match (80%) and approximate match rates (1.3%) between INTAKE24 and an interviewer-led 24HDR among adolescents (11–16 years) and young adults (17–24 years), while omissions (10.7%) and intrusions (7.1%) were also similar to the present study. Interestingly, female participants had higher incidence of matches between both recalls, where male participants were more likely to omit food and drink items, which has also been reported in other studies [22]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Secondly, the use of a questionnaire causes some uncertainty due to social desirability bias. As females are more likely to provide more socially acceptable answers, it cannot be ruled out that girls under study could have reported their own dietary and lifestyle behaviours as being closer to the recommendations than in reality [73,74,75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple 24HR interviews were administered over the phone by a team of experienced registered dietitians over a period of 14 days. Despite the limitations of the reliance on self-report this method is considered the most accurate currently available tool for the assessment of dietary intake in a natural environment 43 . In order to increase accuracy of dietary reports, participants were given a validated 2-dimensional food portion visual 44 and received 10–15 minutes of training on how to use it to estimate portion sizes of commonly eaten foods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%