2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet-induced milk fat depression: Association with changes in milk fatty acid composition and fluidity of milk fat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
84
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
84
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it has been argued that the considerable impact of the maintenance of milk fat fluidity on milk fat secretion (Shingfield et al, 2006;Gama et al, 2008;Toral et al, 2010b) related to the incorporation of cis-9 18:1 and short-chain FAs (4:0 to 10:0) into triacylglycerides is the principal means of assuring milk fat liquidity at body temperature. Marine lipid inhibition of trans-18:1 ruminal saturation, thereby reducing the availability of 18:0 for endogenous mammary synthesis of oleic acid and simultaneously increasing trans-11 18:1 level (with a higher melting point than its equivalent cis-isomer) could reduce milk fat fluidity in FO treatment and would detrimentally affect milk fat maintenance.…”
Section: Milk Fat Depression (Mfd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it has been argued that the considerable impact of the maintenance of milk fat fluidity on milk fat secretion (Shingfield et al, 2006;Gama et al, 2008;Toral et al, 2010b) related to the incorporation of cis-9 18:1 and short-chain FAs (4:0 to 10:0) into triacylglycerides is the principal means of assuring milk fat liquidity at body temperature. Marine lipid inhibition of trans-18:1 ruminal saturation, thereby reducing the availability of 18:0 for endogenous mammary synthesis of oleic acid and simultaneously increasing trans-11 18:1 level (with a higher melting point than its equivalent cis-isomer) could reduce milk fat fluidity in FO treatment and would detrimentally affect milk fat maintenance.…”
Section: Milk Fat Depression (Mfd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BH theory provides a basis for explaining most cases of MFD on starch-rich diets or with plant oil in cows via a direct inhibition of mammary lipogenesis by BH intermediates with confirmed or putative antilipogenic effects [trans-10,cis-12 CLA (Baumgard et al, 2000), cis-10,trans-12 CLA (Saebø et al, 2005), and trans-9,cis-11 CLA (Perfield et al, 2007)]. However, these intermediates do not, in isolation, explain MFD in cows or sheep fed diets containing marine oils (Loor et al, 2005;Gama et al, 2008;Toral et al, 2010). Thus, for dietary conditions with marine oil, Shingfield and Griinari (2007) proposed also including the role of changes in the availability of preformed long-chain FA to the mammary gland in the explanation of MFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for dietary conditions with marine oil, Shingfield and Griinari (2007) proposed also including the role of changes in the availability of preformed long-chain FA to the mammary gland in the explanation of MFD. This would involve both a shortage of 18:0 for endogenous cis-9 18:1 synthesis in the mammary gland and an increase in the supply of trans FA formed in the rumen, which would increase the milk fat melting point and thereby lower the rate of fat removal in mammary epithelial cells (Loor et al, 2005;Gama et al, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bauman & Griinari (2001) found that the decrease in milk fat content when overfeeding fat is generally attributed to altered rumen function, fat biohydrogenation and ruminal formation of trans-10 C18:1 fatty acids. Gama et al (2008) pointed out that an increased supply of trans-10 cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid over other fatty acids to the udder was responsible for milk fat depression in dairy cows. This fatty acid has been recognized as a possible inhibitor of milk fat synthesis, decreasing the activity of lipogenic enzymes in the mammary gland (Baumgard et al, 2002).…”
Section: Effect Of Energy Sources On Milk Yield and Milk Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%