Fish Nutrition 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012319652-1/50010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet Formulation and Manufacture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
175
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
4
175
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms observations of Pezzato et al (2002), who reported that meat and bone meals are protein sources of higher biological value (73.2%) than that of fish meal for Nile tilapia, and can replace up to 100% of fish meal in diets for the species (El-Sayed, 1998). As a matter of fact, because of the high quality and availability of their nutrients for different fish species (Hardy and Barrows, 2002), Nile tilapia included (Santiago and Lovell, 1988), gelatin and casein are actually known as standard protein sources for purified and semi-purified diets (NRC, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms observations of Pezzato et al (2002), who reported that meat and bone meals are protein sources of higher biological value (73.2%) than that of fish meal for Nile tilapia, and can replace up to 100% of fish meal in diets for the species (El-Sayed, 1998). As a matter of fact, because of the high quality and availability of their nutrients for different fish species (Hardy and Barrows, 2002), Nile tilapia included (Santiago and Lovell, 1988), gelatin and casein are actually known as standard protein sources for purified and semi-purified diets (NRC, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poultry by-product meal can also be high in ash (N15%) and is often variable in proximate composition. Protein digestibility can be quite low for hydrolyzed feather meal due to high levels of keratin (Dong et al, 1993;Hardy and Barrows, 2002).…”
Section: A U T H O R ' S P E R S O N a L C O P Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used to prepare the microdiets resembled the method of particleassisted rotational agglomeration (PARA) (Hardy and Barrows, 2002). The particle size of the formulated diets ranged from 200 to 250 µm for fish between 3 and 12 days after hatch (DAH) and 250-380 µm for the larvae thereafter.…”
Section: Diets and Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%