2006
DOI: 10.1175/ei167.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet, Energy, and Global Warming

Abstract: The energy consumption of animal- and plant-based diets and, more broadly, the range of energetic planetary footprints spanned by reasonable dietary choices are compared. It is demonstrated that the greenhouse gas emissions of various diets vary by as much as the difference between owning an average sedan versus a sport-utility vehicle under typical driving conditions. The authors conclude with a brief review of the safety of plant-based diets, and find no reasons for concern.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
4
123
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, a similar perspective allows estimating that the sole production of animal derived food implies an 18% share of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, equivalent to industry and higher than transports [15][16][17][18]. Therefore, changes in food choices might have the same magnitude as modifications in mobility patterns [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, a similar perspective allows estimating that the sole production of animal derived food implies an 18% share of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, equivalent to industry and higher than transports [15][16][17][18]. Therefore, changes in food choices might have the same magnitude as modifications in mobility patterns [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As China has limited arable land and is facing a variety of pressures (Khan, Hanjra, & Mu, 2009;Larson, 2013), increasing livestock products is a serious threat. For the sake of food security, some scientists appeal to decrease livestock products consumption (Ilea, 2009;Eshel & Martin, 2006). In fact, livestock products contribute significantly to reduce poverty, enhance nutrition and support crops planting in smallholder systems (Thornton, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent survey of 505 subjects from 7 different metropolitan U.S. areas showed that the most popular response for the single most effective things subjects could do to conserve energy in their lives was to turn off their lights. Almost 20% of respondents mentioned this solution, compared with 13% who said -drive less‖, while neither eating less meat nor switching to a meat-free diet was mentioned [33], although research shows that U.S. greenhouse gas emissions would be reduced by 6% if Americans switched to plant-based proteins [34].…”
Section: Conservation Vs Contributions To the Tragedy Of The Commonsmentioning
confidence: 99%