2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-015-2537-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet as a mechanism of coexistence between intertidal fish species of the U.K.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that the allopatric Dee Why population of B. cocosensis has a relatively stable trophic niche between seasons, whereas the two sympatric species vary between very low (c. 5%) and almost one-third (c. 30%) niche overlap in summer and winter, respectively. This is consistent with previous works, which have suggested that a higher diet niche plasticity is beneficial in a dynamic environment such as the intertidal zone (Barrett et al, 2016;Compaire et al, 2016;Grossman et al, 1980;Vinagre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results suggest that the allopatric Dee Why population of B. cocosensis has a relatively stable trophic niche between seasons, whereas the two sympatric species vary between very low (c. 5%) and almost one-third (c. 30%) niche overlap in summer and winter, respectively. This is consistent with previous works, which have suggested that a higher diet niche plasticity is beneficial in a dynamic environment such as the intertidal zone (Barrett et al, 2016;Compaire et al, 2016;Grossman et al, 1980;Vinagre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…30%) niche overlap in summer and winter, respectively. This is consistent with previous works, which have suggested that a higher diet niche plasticity is beneficial in a dynamic environment such as the intertidal zone (Barrett et al ., 2016; Compaire et al ., 2016; Grossman et al ., 1980; Vinagre et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Velasco et al (2010) found that co-occurrence of intertidal fish around the Gulf of Cadiz, Spain, was not affected by dietary overlap; prey availability was reported as being diverse and plentiful, resulting in reduced competition and less need of spatial segregation. This further supports the findings of Barrett et al (2016) who described species such as L. pholis and T. bubalis being able to coexist due to prey being plentiful and dietary traits being dissimilar, albeit with some small dietary overlap. Of course, it is possible that dietary traits were dissimilar as a result of the presence of one fish species to another; when coexisting, evidence suggests that species with generalist dietary traits tend to restrict their dietary range in the presence of potential dietary competitors (Bearzi, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Koop & Gibson (1991) conducted a study of distribution and movement of the butterfish ( Pholis gunnellus , Linnaeus, 1758) on an intertidal region of the west coast of Scotland and found that their distributions on the shore were not predicted by their size, but whether the same is true of other intertidal fish species, such as the frequently encountered L. pholis and T. bubalis , two sympatric species (Barrett et al , 2016), is currently uncertain. It is further uncertain as to their degrees of sympatricity with regard to whether two species coexist not only at shore level, but also in the same tidal pools and how multiple species utilize pools to sustain their coexistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the life cycle of intertidal fish species is very similar in terms of reproductive strategies: females spawning demersal adhesive eggs and males defending the nest (Oliveira et al, 1999;Mazzoldi et al, 2011), use of space and feeding behaviours (Nieder, 1997). The often syntopic nature of many intertidal fish communities suggests that resources such as food are shared and consequently that competition would increase where prey items are scarce (Barrett et al, 2015). In order to avoid competition among their offspring for food, shelter and space, spawning of fish species with common characteristics is temporally or spatially segregated (Tsikliras et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%