2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and trophic niche space and overlap of Lake Ontario salmonid species using stable isotopes and stomach contents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior knowledge about the depth and temperature occupancies of these species in Lake Ontario based on sporadic fishery surveys (Elrod, O’Gorman, & Schneider, ; Stewart & Bowlby, ), in combination with a broader knowledge base about their biology, led us to predict that lake trout would occupy colder and deeper waters than would Chinook salmon. The data presented here complement recently published stable isotope data about diet overlap between these species (Mumby et al, ; Yuille et al, ), and provide the best characterization to date of the thermal and vertical niche segregation/overlap between the two species. As such, this study is relevant to discussions among fishery managers and stakeholders in the Great Lakes about the intensity of competition for resources (physical space, prey, temperature) between native and non‐native predators.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prior knowledge about the depth and temperature occupancies of these species in Lake Ontario based on sporadic fishery surveys (Elrod, O’Gorman, & Schneider, ; Stewart & Bowlby, ), in combination with a broader knowledge base about their biology, led us to predict that lake trout would occupy colder and deeper waters than would Chinook salmon. The data presented here complement recently published stable isotope data about diet overlap between these species (Mumby et al, ; Yuille et al, ), and provide the best characterization to date of the thermal and vertical niche segregation/overlap between the two species. As such, this study is relevant to discussions among fishery managers and stakeholders in the Great Lakes about the intensity of competition for resources (physical space, prey, temperature) between native and non‐native predators.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Chinook salmon are known to almost exclusively consume alewife in Lake Ontario (Jones, Koonce, & Gorman, ), and have one of the two smallest isotopic niche widths among salmonids there (Mumby et al, ; Yuille et al, ). In their native range, adult Chinook salmon forage primarily on another schooling pelagic fish, Pacific herring ( Clupea pallasii ; Healey, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The upper trophic position and longer lifespan (5-15 yr) as well as pelagic foraging and highly mobile behavior of these species means that their diets will incorporate a broad range of resources from across the lake (Rush et al 2012;Guiry et al 2016b;Fera et al 2017), providing a time-averaged perspective on processes affecting the nitrogen cycle at a lake-wide, multiseasonal scale. A comparison of isotopic variation among three taxa, each with a different behavioral strategy and trophic position (Holm et al 2009;Fera et al 2017;Mumby et al 2018), should make isotopic trends associated with dietary shifts at the species level (Kiriluk et al 1995;van der Merwe et al 2003;Lumb and Johnson 2012;Rush et al 2012;Yuille et al 2015;Colborne et al 2016;Guiry et al 2016b;Fera et al 2017;Mumby et al 2018). For sediment data sourced from the literature: LO G32-93, LO H32-94 , and LO 1/3 (McFadden et al 2004).…”
Section: Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretations also include previously published data from archaeological (n = 68; van derMerwe et al 2003;Guiry et al 2016b) and modern(post-1958 CE; n = 819;Kiriluk et al 1995;Lumb and Johnson 2012;Rush et al 2012;Yuille et al 2015;Colborne et al 2016;Fera et al 2017;Mumby et al 2018) specimens. ZooMS analyses of 290 samples confirmed or helped to refine 244 nonspecies taxonomic identifications provided through bone morphology analyses by zooarchaeologists (it confirmed the identification for 225 of these 244 specimens and refined it to the level of species for the remaining 19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%