2005
DOI: 10.3354/meps295295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and foraging areas of Southern Ocean seabirds and their prey inferred from stable isotopes: review and case study of Wilson’s storm-petrel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
137
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
9
137
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies (Quillfeldt et al 2005, Cherel & Hobson 2007, recent data collated from the literature indicated a marked decrease in stable carbon isotope ratios in Southern Ocean predators with latitude (Appendices 1 & 2, Fig. 1).…”
Section: Breeding Season Distributionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As in previous studies (Quillfeldt et al 2005, Cherel & Hobson 2007, recent data collated from the literature indicated a marked decrease in stable carbon isotope ratios in Southern Ocean predators with latitude (Appendices 1 & 2, Fig. 1).…”
Section: Breeding Season Distributionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Data analysis. For the literature survey (Appendices 1 & 2 available at: www.int-res.com/articles/ suppl/m373p137_app.pdf), we included stable isotope data of pelagic prey species as well as seabirds and seals of the Southern Ocean, which are updated from Quillfeldt et al (2005). Particularly for seabirds and seals, there has been a huge increase in the available information since the last review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large-scale changes in latitude (e.g. Quillfeldt et al 2005Quillfeldt et al , 2008 can be superimposed on smaller-scale changes like nearshore vs. offshore habitats or benthic vs. pelagic food webs. Furthermore, a change in δ 13 C can indicate a switch be tween isotopically distinctive prey types that can migrate to a foraging habitat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the lower δ 15 N of caledonica (11.0 to 14.0‰) suggests 387 the additional consumption of prey from lower trophic levels, such as cephalopods or marine 388 crustaceans (δ 15 N of 8.1 to 10.2‰, and 3.6 to 6.5‰, ) (Quillfeldt et al 2005). This interpretation 389 assumes there are no differences in regional baselines for δ 15 N, which is supported by the similarity in 390 δ…”
Section: Pterodroma Externa and Pterodroma Sandwichensis (Ballance Ementioning
confidence: 99%