1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00005234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and food selection in the endemic Hawaiian amphidromous goby, Sicyopterus stimpsoni (Pisces: Gobiidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, differences in performance between A2 and A3 are seen in S. stimpsoni that are similar to those in the other species. It is possible that, despite its specialized diet (Kido, 1996a, Julius et al, 2005, S. stimpsoni has retained this pattern as a primitive state from their common ancestor with other gobioids tested. The presence of A2 and A3 performance differences in the eleotrid E. sandwicensis (a member of the outgroup to other gobioids: Thacker, 2003) and the other species we examined is consistent with this possibility.…”
Section: Functional Differentiation Between A2 and A3 In Hawaiian Strmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, differences in performance between A2 and A3 are seen in S. stimpsoni that are similar to those in the other species. It is possible that, despite its specialized diet (Kido, 1996a, Julius et al, 2005, S. stimpsoni has retained this pattern as a primitive state from their common ancestor with other gobioids tested. The presence of A2 and A3 performance differences in the eleotrid E. sandwicensis (a member of the outgroup to other gobioids: Thacker, 2003) and the other species we examined is consistent with this possibility.…”
Section: Functional Differentiation Between A2 and A3 In Hawaiian Strmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although most Hawaiian stream gobioids have a ventrally positioned mouth, differences in their diets have been associated with morphological differences among these species (Kido, 1996a(Kido, ,b, 1997Julius et al, 2005). For example, Sicyopterus stimpsoni feed by scraping algae from rock surfaces using a highly protru-sible premaxilla equipped with rows of tricuspid teeth (Kido, 1996b;Fitzsimons et al, 2003;Julius et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most other studies have focused on the reproductive biology (Ha and Kinzie, 1996;Way et al, 1998;Lindstrom, 1998), distribution (Kinzie, 1988;Higashi and Yamamoto, 1993), evolution (Zink et al, 1996) and feeding habitats (Burky et al, 1993;Kido, 1996aKido, , 1997 of the native amphidromous fish, shrimp and snail. A series of reports by Brasher (1996Brasher ( , 1997a, determined a reduction in stream flow, and thus stream habitat, due to a diversion led to an overlapped distribution of native fauna, in addition to a reduction in the population of native fauna in mid-to upper Hawaiian stream reaches above a dam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Macroinvertebrate communities are an important component of the Hawaiian stream ecosystems, as a major food source for most native Hawaiian fish species (Kido, 1996a). Reduced stream flow could limit macroinvertebrate habitat, cause shifts in species interactions, eliminate species, and allow introduction of invasive species; therefore, altering the food web of the stream ecosystem (Poff et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items utilized to the greatest extent varied among seasons, which suggests the shimofuri goby is an opportunistic generalist rather than a specialist focusing on a particular food type regardless of its abundance. The tendency of shimofuri goby to concentrate on the seasonally most abundant prey is not unusual among gobies, which tend to be opportunistic generalists (e.g., Beumer 1978;Mehner 1992;Kido 1996). Such flexible feeding habits are beneficial in estuaries where environmental conditions are subject to change annually, seasonally, and daily (Grossman et al 1980;Swenson and McCray 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%