2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diesel Engine Transient NOx and Airpath Control using Rate-based Model Predictive Controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a constrained case is evaluated, in which the engine-out NO X constraint is tightened, and now the controller must track the same reference intake manifold pressure P im ref as before, while satisfying the time-varying engine-out NO X constraint N O X cstr . Note that Duraiarasan et al 21 presents the simulation and the experimental validation of the low-level controller which is a standalone predictive intake manifold pressure controller with NO X constraints. However, this section in this paper presents the low-level controller in a hierarchical setup and this section on low-level controller is pertinent to compare the key differences against the high-level controller like the cost functions, prediction horizons, the linear and the non-linear airpath models.…”
Section: Low-level Controller: Air Path Predictive Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a constrained case is evaluated, in which the engine-out NO X constraint is tightened, and now the controller must track the same reference intake manifold pressure P im ref as before, while satisfying the time-varying engine-out NO X constraint N O X cstr . Note that Duraiarasan et al 21 presents the simulation and the experimental validation of the low-level controller which is a standalone predictive intake manifold pressure controller with NO X constraints. However, this section in this paper presents the low-level controller in a hierarchical setup and this section on low-level controller is pertinent to compare the key differences against the high-level controller like the cost functions, prediction horizons, the linear and the non-linear airpath models.…”
Section: Low-level Controller: Air Path Predictive Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%