Diesel Engine Selection on Locomotive Using AHP Methods

Petrović, Ivan; Hederić, Željko; Stojkov, Marinko; Samarđžić, Ivan

doi:10.17559/tv-20210104211621

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…where ρ df is the diesel fuel density, g e is the specific effective diesel fuel consumption given by the manufacturer [19,20].…”

Section: Modeling Of the Diesel Engine And The Alternator With The Re...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Energy Consumption Analysis of the Hybrid Diesel Train and the Hybrid Fuel Cell Train

2023

Teh. vjesn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper compares train energy consumption of hybrid diesel-electric multiple unit (HDEMU) to hydrogen fuel-cell multiple unit (HFCMU). In the simulation, the parameters of the DMU HŽ7022 train were used for the train model created in Matlab/Simulink environment. Since the train is powered by three diesel engines in original design, it was hybridized by removing one engine and adding a battery and a supercapacitor. For comparison, a train model was made with fuel cells that have rated power of two existing diesel engines, and it was hybridized with a battery and a supercapacitor, as in the simulation with the hybridization of diesel engines. The results are presented by comparing energy consumption for both trains. In addition, voltages, electric current values and power loads of power sources are shown. As the sustainability of the system, the SOC (State of Charge) values of both the battery and the supercapacitor are presented.

show abstract

“…where ρ df is the diesel fuel density, g e is the specific effective diesel fuel consumption given by the manufacturer [19,20].…”

Section: Modeling Of the Diesel Engine And The Alternator With The Re...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Energy Consumption Analysis of the Hybrid Diesel Train and the Hybrid Fuel Cell Train

2023

Teh. vjesn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the determination of the propulsion system also considers the following factors: i) low investment costs; ii) a good level of system reliability and maintenance; iii) low level of vulnerability and operational risk of the system [15], and; iv) the low level of noise produced [16] and the availability of spare parts in the market [17,18], Faustinus [17] stated that through the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which is one of the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, He was able to complete the selection of the ship main engine optimally. In addition, the AHP method has been widely used in the choice of other vehicle engines [19,20],…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Selection of Propeller and Primary Engine Matching of A 30 GT Fishing Vessel (Case Study KM Inka Mina 759)

Muhammad

Thariq

Yusuf

et al. 2022

Kapal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reducing fuel consumption and carbon emissions in the development of ship propulsion systems following the required Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) has become a concern for the fishing industry as determined by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). This study analyzes the suitability of using a 30 GT fishing vessel propeller and propulsion engine for optimum efficiency. The analysis focuses on developing a propulsion system selection model, studying the characteristics of the ship's resistance, loading propellers, and selecting the appropriate engine. The propeller-engine matching procedure predicts the propeller and engine suitability. Furthermore, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method determines the suitability level for the propeller and diesel engine. The results showed the highest level of suitability for the Yanmar 6CH-HHTEC engine versus the A.30X34 type propeller with 31.7%. Then the Deutz BF06M1013MC engine versus the B.30X28 propeller type, the Yuchai YC6A170C engine versus the B30X28 propeller type, and the Volvo D7ATA engine versus the B30X28 propeller type with percentages of 26.6%, 26.4%, and 15.3%, respectively. The high level of SP2 selection is due to the propulsion system having minimal noise levels, dimensions, and engine weight but having maximum power.

show abstract

Diesel Engine Selection on Locomotive Using AHP Methods

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Comparative Energy Consumption Analysis of the Hybrid Diesel Train and the Hybrid Fuel Cell Train

Comparative Energy Consumption Analysis of the Hybrid Diesel Train and the Hybrid Fuel Cell Train

The Selection of Propeller and Primary Engine Matching of A 30 GT Fishing Vessel (Case Study KM Inka Mina 759)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About