Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectrophoresis assisted rapid, selective and single cell detection of antibiotic resistant bacteria with G-FETs

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, to prevent false positives that could occur due to nonspecific adsorption of CA1, it is crucial to obtain uniform functionalization of aptamers on the graphene surface. As such, the attachment process was optimized using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine attachment and coverage of the aptamers (Kumar et al, 2020). Patterned graphene chips were incubated for 30 minutes with high concentration (10 m M ) PBASE linker dissolved in DMF (Wang et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, to prevent false positives that could occur due to nonspecific adsorption of CA1, it is crucial to obtain uniform functionalization of aptamers on the graphene surface. As such, the attachment process was optimized using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine attachment and coverage of the aptamers (Kumar et al, 2020). Patterned graphene chips were incubated for 30 minutes with high concentration (10 m M ) PBASE linker dissolved in DMF (Wang et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene Field Effect Transistors (G‐FETs) have shown great promise in the detection of DNA, proteins and cells due to their high sensitivity, scalability, biocompatibility, ease of functionalization via a non‐covalent attachment process and compatibility with various substrates (Fu, et al, 2017; Fu et al, 2017; Gao et al, 2016; Kumar et al, 2020; Ohno et al, 2009, 2010; Ping et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2017). To determine the possibility of POC detection of CA, it is crucial to investigate the mechanisms of interaction between G‐FETs and CA1, their detection limit, sensitivity, selectivity and utility in a clinically relevant environment (Kostarelos & Novoselov, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28,30,34,35,36,37 In our recent work, we demonstrated a highly sensitive G-FET for the detection of biomarkers such as CA-I (oral diseases biomarker) in saliva, 38 and antibiotic resistant bacteria, both at clinically relevant concentrations. 39 However, the G-FET design in our prior work was limited to detection of a single target, with each chip functionalized with a single probe, provided minimal passivation, and required a platinum (Pt) wire as a separate reference electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we utilized the DEP technique to place SrTiO 3 nanoparticles between two electrodes and measure their electrical properties [17]. In the biological science field, DEP has also been utilized for trapping microorganisms [18,19], cell separation and characterization [1,[20][21][22][23], preventing membrane fouling in bioreactors [24], and bacterial isolation [25]. Even though the technique is useful, and many studies have been reported, the conventional DEP technique has a major constraint: it requires attaching wires directly to the electrodes, which may limit some applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%