The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.05.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric response, functionality and energy storage in epoxy nanocomposites: Barium titanate vs exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the conductivity is increased from 3.8 9 10 -10 to 1.5 9 10 -7 S/m [105]. The addition of GNP to epoxy gives a polymer-matrix composite exhibiting relative dielectric constant 16 at 1 MHz, whereas the addition of barium titanate to epoxy gives a composite exhibiting relative dielectric constant only 6.5 at 1 MHz [106].…”
Section: Graphite Nanoplatelet Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the conductivity is increased from 3.8 9 10 -10 to 1.5 9 10 -7 S/m [105]. The addition of GNP to epoxy gives a polymer-matrix composite exhibiting relative dielectric constant 16 at 1 MHz, whereas the addition of barium titanate to epoxy gives a composite exhibiting relative dielectric constant only 6.5 at 1 MHz [106].…”
Section: Graphite Nanoplatelet Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, IP is observed in the neat epoxy spectrum, and loss index attains high values. IP has been detected in loss spectra of many polymers due to the presence of additives, impurities and plasticizers [32][33][34][35]. On the other hand, increased values of loss tangent should be related to high values of the dielectric loss ("&), since tan' is defined as the ratio of the imaginary to the real part of dielectric permittivity.…”
Section: Hydration Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IP appears in heterogeneous systems because of the accumulation of non-bonded charges at the interface between the constituents of the system, where they form large dipoles. The inertia of these dipoles to follow the alternation of the applied field is the origin of the IP relaxation process [45][46][47][48][49], which is the slowest recorded effect. In general, IP is strengthened with the increase of the reinforcing phase and its relaxation time is enhanced.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%