1979
DOI: 10.1021/ma60072a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric Relaxation Studies of Segmented Polyesters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For PBT, the y relaxation has been attributed to the local mode motions of the ester group in noncrystalline regions, while the y transition of the copolymers is believed to be a combination of the local motions of the tetramethylene oxide units of the soft segment and the y relaxation of the uncrystallized hard segments. 13 As the hard-segment concentration in the copolymer increases, there is a smooth transition of the ß relaxation to higher temperatures, and the experimental values are consistent with the predictions of the Fox-Flory expression if the fraction of crystalline material is accounted for. For the ß relaxation, activation energies (derived from Arrhenius plots) were found to vary from =67 to 32 kcal/mol with decreasing hard-segment concentration (from PBT to PEE-45) and from =13 to 10 kcal/mol for the y transition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For PBT, the y relaxation has been attributed to the local mode motions of the ester group in noncrystalline regions, while the y transition of the copolymers is believed to be a combination of the local motions of the tetramethylene oxide units of the soft segment and the y relaxation of the uncrystallized hard segments. 13 As the hard-segment concentration in the copolymer increases, there is a smooth transition of the ß relaxation to higher temperatures, and the experimental values are consistent with the predictions of the Fox-Flory expression if the fraction of crystalline material is accounted for. For the ß relaxation, activation energies (derived from Arrhenius plots) were found to vary from =67 to 32 kcal/mol with decreasing hard-segment concentration (from PBT to PEE-45) and from =13 to 10 kcal/mol for the y transition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the reported activation energy for dielectric relaxation at glass transition of PTMO homopolymer is 154 kJ/mol (37 kcal/mo1). 22 The behavior of the PTMO soft segment in thermoplastic polyesters is not expected to be much different from that in polyurethanes except that hydrogen bonding is absent. Thus, the data of Lilaonitkul and Cooper could be used for comparison.22 They found that activation energy of the PTMO block (MW = 1000) glass transition increases from 154 to 249 kJ/mol as the hard segment concentration increases from 34 to 84 w t S. They also found that annealing decreases and absorbed water increases the activation energy of the p transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-frequency polarizations in segmented polyetheresters have been studied by North et al27 and by Lilaonitkul and Cooper. 28 Both groups attributed the process to the polarization of free space charge in a multiphase medium, where one or more phases exhibits significant steady-state electrical conductivity. Due to an early reference to the process by J. C. Maxwell (1892) and elaboration by K. W. Wagner (1914), the process has become known as the Maxwell-Wagner loss process.…”
Section: /(Q)mentioning
confidence: 99%