2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020je006601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric Properties of the Medusae Fossae Formation and Implications for Ice Content

Abstract: The Medusae Fossae Formation (MFF) spans a ∼5,000 km region along the martian dichotomy boundary. The deposit comprises the large massifs Amazonis Mensa, Eumenides Dorsum, Lucus Planum, Aeolis Planum, Zephyria Planum, and Gordii Dorsum, and lower-lying materials with a range of areal coverage. Estimates of MFF deposit volume range from 1.4 × 10 6 km 3 (Bradley et al., 2002) to 1.9 × 10 6 km 3 (Hynek et al., 2003). Long inferred to be comprised of friable, low-density material, the MFF exhibits extensive wind e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This range in attenuation corresponds to a range in loss tangent of ∼0.002–0.004. A loss tangent of 0.003 is consistent with previous estimates using MARSIS data (Watters et al., 2007) and those obtained using SHARAD data (Campbell et al., 2021; Campbell & Morgan, 2018). Estimates of the loss tangent of the SPLD range from ∼0.001 to 0.005 (Plaut et al., 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This range in attenuation corresponds to a range in loss tangent of ∼0.002–0.004. A loss tangent of 0.003 is consistent with previous estimates using MARSIS data (Watters et al., 2007) and those obtained using SHARAD data (Campbell et al., 2021; Campbell & Morgan, 2018). Estimates of the loss tangent of the SPLD range from ∼0.001 to 0.005 (Plaut et al., 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the depth of these reflectors was calculated with a permittivity of 7.8, which is likely too high for materials forming Medusae Fossae Formation and its reworked material. Considering previous estimates of the real dielectric constant of 2–3 in the Medusae Fossae Formation (Campbell et al., 2021; Carter et al., 2009; Watters et al., 2007), the depths are likely underestimated in this study.…”
Section: Sharad Investigationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As a result, we expect Zephyria Planum, Far East Medusae Fossae A, Far East Medusae Fossae C, and East Medusae Fossae B to have the highest likelihood for water ice detection by GRS/NS. Campbell et al (2021) proposed a two-layer model for the MFF, with the top 300-600 m as a fine-grained, selfcompacting layer, and the bottom 2 km as a thicker layer of possible water ice. If the self-compacting layer proposed by Campbell et al (2021) did in fact extend to shallow depths (<10 m) as well, then it is unlikely that the material would be very rich in ice, though this is difficult to reconcile with the GRS and NS data (e.g., Wilson et al 2018).…”
Section: Implications For the Subsurface Ice Table And In Situ Resour...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Curiosity rover is headed toward this location, we might have a chance to validate our age and erosion rate estimations. (c) An active subject of debate, some interpretations of the MFF using radar and NS data have suggested the presence of water ice in the subsurface (e.g., Watters et al 2007;Mandt et al 2008;Carter et al 2009;Wilson et al 2018;Campbell et al 2021). The darkest blue color in this figure corresponds to an elevation of −6 km and the brightest yellow corresponds to an elevation of +22 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation