2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2018.2879350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric Properties of Single Cells Subjected to Heat Shock Using DEP Cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It means an increase of 1.6 × 10 −4 S/m approximately, which is closer to the value proposed in this paper than the one shown in [46]. In addition, other authors [56] explain the phenomenon of the decrease in cytoplasm conductivity because of a loss of ions. Such a loss is explained by the cell membrane leakage commented above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It means an increase of 1.6 × 10 −4 S/m approximately, which is closer to the value proposed in this paper than the one shown in [46]. In addition, other authors [56] explain the phenomenon of the decrease in cytoplasm conductivity because of a loss of ions. Such a loss is explained by the cell membrane leakage commented above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Such a loss is explained by the cell membrane leakage commented above. This layer behaviour has been studied not only for yeast cells but for Chinese hamster ovary cells too [56] in a temperature spectrum ranged from 7 °C to 50 °C. Surprisingly, the effect is inverted for low temperatures [57] and cell membrane conductivity is decreased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, methods capable of achieving cellular characterization from the qualitative measurement of the alteration of the cell’s mechanical properties have been developed. Conversely, there are few works focused on the measurement of the dielectric parameters that enable us to obtain the value of the exerted DEP over the cells [16,17,36,37,38]. These research articles, as well as this one, based their theoretical models on the mathematical expression of DEP given by Pohl [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error bars are associated with the impact of size variation on the estimated Re{ K CM }. The experimental estimate for the K CM and the previously measured Re{ K CM } are within 0.08 [12,62]. Being able to detect changes in K CM of 0.08 is useful as biological changes such as apoptosis produce a change of 0.4 in the K CM at 6 MHz [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…5A, and these are shown in Fig. 5C along with the experimental estimate of the K CM for CHO cells [62]. The error bars are associated with the impact of size variation on the estimated Re{ K CM }.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%