2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric properties of CaCu3Ti4O12 improved by chromium/lanthanum co-doping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only report of improvement in the dielectric properties of CCTO by co-doping was for La and Cr codoped CCTO ceramics [25]. There are no reports on improvement of CCTO dielectric properties by co-doping in Ca 2+ and Cu 2+ sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only report of improvement in the dielectric properties of CCTO by co-doping was for La and Cr codoped CCTO ceramics [25]. There are no reports on improvement of CCTO dielectric properties by co-doping in Ca 2+ and Cu 2+ sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1946 Ω for the sample of 1 -723, to 809 Ω for 1 -823, and to 628 Ω for 1 -923. As the sintering at higher temperature principally results in a higher density of the bulk material, , the potential porosities within the samples sintered at lower temperatures can act as nonconductive barriers for the ion transfer through the microstructure. The experimentally determined band gap of 1.64 eV (vide infra), in combination with Fe–Fe distances of 2.6808(4)–3.8495(3) Å, would not suggest a predominant electronic contribution to the electrical impedance, while a predominant ionic Na···S interaction, the high dielectric values that sharply drop at comparably low frequencies, and the presence of statistically distributed Fe vacancies would suggest an ionic contribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(a)-(d)) and a compact structure, which further generated higher resistivity and lower dielectric loss. In addition, all the dielectric loss is almost independent of frequency in the range of 10 3 -10 5 except for pure CCTO ceramics, as a consequence of the more stability of grain boundary resistance (due to smaller grains and consequently the greater number of grain boundaries [21,22]) at the broad frequency range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%