2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.036401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric matrix and plasmon dispersion in strongly coupled electronic bilayer liquids

Abstract: We develop a dielectric matrix and analyze plasmon dispersion in strongly coupled charged-particle bilayers in the 0 T = quantum domain. The formulation is based on the classical quasi-localized charge approximation (QLCA) and extends the QLCA formalism into the quantum domain. Its development, which parallels that of 2D companion paper [Phys. Rev. E 70, 026406 (2004) what has been previously predicted for classical charged-particle bilayers and subsequently confirmed by recent molecular dynamics computer simu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method has been recently proposed [73,74,75,76] for the extension of the QLCA to take some of the neglected effects into account by combining the D L (k), D T (k) as local field factors with the Vlasov density-density response. In this approximation…”
Section: Quasi Localized Charge Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method has been recently proposed [73,74,75,76] for the extension of the QLCA to take some of the neglected effects into account by combining the D L (k), D T (k) as local field factors with the Vlasov density-density response. In this approximation…”
Section: Quasi Localized Charge Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 1 we compare the spin-averaged pair-distribution functions of a bilayer, g 11 bi ͑r͒ ͑intralayer͒ and g 12 bi ͑r͒ ͑interlayer͒, as obtained from the diffusion Monte Carlo simulations, 31 with the spinresolved pair-distribution functions g ↑↑ m ͑r͒ and g ↑↓ m ͑r͒ of the reference monolayer. 32 It is seen that there is an overall good agreement between the corresponding distribution functions, i.e., g 11 bi agrees with g ↑↑ m and g 12 bi with g ↑↓ m .…”
Section: ͑14͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ⌳ increases, the agreement between the bilayer pair-distribution function g 12 bi ͑r͒ and the monolayer pair-distribution function g ↑↓ m ͑r͒ will deteriorate. However, the disagreement between the interlayer correlations and the unlike-spin correlation in the reference monolayer is more severe at small r than at large r. 31 The pair-distribution function at small values of r, in turn, should control the behavior of the LFFs at large wave vector q ӷ 2k F , while the main contribution to the Coulomb drag, at low densities, comes from scattering processes with q near 2k F . Thus, we see that our approach could be justified for the problem at hand, even when the interlayer spacing is less than or comparable to the in-layer interparticle distance, ⌳Շr s a B * , which is the case in the experiments of interest here.…”
Section: ͑14͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ω G (d) is a functional of h 12 (r) as given in [17]. In the BPBL h 12 (r) is governed by a central peak h ′ 12 (r) around r = 0 [2] (see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%