1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00199037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric constants of tephroite, fayalite and olivine and the oxide additivity rule

Abstract: Abstract.The dielectric constants and dissipation factors of synthetic tephroite (Mn2SiO4), fayalite (Fe2SiO4) and a forsteritic olivine (Mga.soFeo.2zSiO4) were measured at 1 MHz using a two-terminal method and empirically determined edge corrections. The results are:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing Fig. 6(a) to the ideal behaviour of n at infinite wavelength, the average CDA fit n value at zero frequency for Fo 0 () is in good agreement with the average dielectric function for fayalite determined by Shannon et al (1991) (). n at long λ for forsterite should be 2.64 (based on a simple average of ε ν=0 = 6.867, 7.392, 6.739 for each polarization, Shannon & Subramanian 1989), which is in rough agreement but slightly above the value of 2.1 predicted from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Comparing Fig. 6(a) to the ideal behaviour of n at infinite wavelength, the average CDA fit n value at zero frequency for Fo 0 () is in good agreement with the average dielectric function for fayalite determined by Shannon et al (1991) (). n at long λ for forsterite should be 2.64 (based on a simple average of ε ν=0 = 6.867, 7.392, 6.739 for each polarization, Shannon & Subramanian 1989), which is in rough agreement but slightly above the value of 2.1 predicted from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Though the dielectric constants of the minerals were not fitted while developing the potential, we examined how well their values were predicted by the newly developed potential. The values were calculated using GULP [ Gale and Rohl , ] and are tabulated along with the experimental values [ Shannon et al , ; Olhoeft , ] in Table . For forsterite and fayalite, we notice that while all three diagonal components of the predicted dielectric constants are much lower than those from experiments, they agreed in their relative strengths with those from experiments.…”
Section: Atomic‐scale Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forsterite and fayalite values from experiments are taken from Shannon et al [], and the orthopyroxene values (i.e., enstatite and ferrosilite) are taken from Olhoeft []. The values from Tilocca et al [] were computed using a shell model.…”
Section: Atomic‐scale Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theory by Debye and Conwell (1954) implies that a constant α depends on the electric charge of the species (proton) and the dielectric constant of the material. Since dielectric constant of a mineral does not change so much among minerals (e.g., Shannon et al 1992Shannon et al , 1991, α should not depend so much on minerals. The reported values of α for olivine by Poe et al (2010) are larger than other estimated values by a factor of 10 to 50 that is at odd from the theoretical point of view.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Electrical Conductivity: Does Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%