1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(97)00588-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric constants of liquid formamide, N-methylformamide and dimethylformamide via molecular Ornstein-Zernike theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent MOZ study of an OPLS model for formamide 40 the internal excess energy was also 15% too small with respect to the simulations, whereas the dielectric constants were in excellent agreement. This agreement may be due to the special features of the liquid structure in formamide and shows that the results obtained here cannot be generalized to all protic solvents.…”
Section: Comparison Of Thermodynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In a recent MOZ study of an OPLS model for formamide 40 the internal excess energy was also 15% too small with respect to the simulations, whereas the dielectric constants were in excellent agreement. This agreement may be due to the special features of the liquid structure in formamide and shows that the results obtained here cannot be generalized to all protic solvents.…”
Section: Comparison Of Thermodynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As above indicated for the case of the 1d ‐FM system, a cosolvent might be required because of the insolubility of 1d in FM, but this rationale does not apply to the similar 1d ‐NMF system. The need of a cosolvent might be related to the reported disruption of the H‐bond structure of the amide caused by its presence;29 or with an efficient solvation of the product by the cosolvent. Further work is needed to clarify this phenomenon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the dielectric constant in the remaining proteins was based on recent studies, which infer that the value of ε in the core of a protein is higher than usually considered (Schaefer et al 1997; Garcia‐Moreno et al 1997). The protein interior should be rich in strong dipoles, as N‐methylformamide, which is taken as the solvent analog of the peptide groups and has a very high dielectric constant, ε = 186 (Richardi et al 1997). The calculated dielectric constant can be very low if only electronic polarization is taken into account, while quite different are the values when the nuclear motions are accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%