1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00310214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diel movement patterns of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) in relation to El Bajo Espiritu Santo: a refuging central-position social system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
2
10

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
106
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study presents long-term quantitative spatial and temporal information of a multi-species reef shark aggregation. Several hypotheses have been posed to explain reef shark aggregations, such as refuging (Klimley & Nelson 1984), predator avoidance (Wetherbee et al 2007), courtship, mating and pre-pupping (McKibben & Nelson 1986). Previous studies of daytime aggregations of reef-associated sharks suggested that aggregations were for behavioural thermoregulation to aid embryonic development or to avoid aggressive males (Economakis & Lobel 1998, Hight & Lowe 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study presents long-term quantitative spatial and temporal information of a multi-species reef shark aggregation. Several hypotheses have been posed to explain reef shark aggregations, such as refuging (Klimley & Nelson 1984), predator avoidance (Wetherbee et al 2007), courtship, mating and pre-pupping (McKibben & Nelson 1986). Previous studies of daytime aggregations of reef-associated sharks suggested that aggregations were for behavioural thermoregulation to aid embryonic development or to avoid aggressive males (Economakis & Lobel 1998, Hight & Lowe 2007.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregations have been observed in both adult and juvenile size classes for some species (e.g. Klimley & Nelson 1984, Duncan & Holland 2006 and often result in, or are attributable to, site fidelity and 'refuging' behaviour, where aggregations occur around a core daytime area and disperse at night (e.g. Klimley & Nelson 1984, Economakis & Lobel 1998, Hight & Lowe 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many animals restrict their movement to areas much smaller than one might expect from observed levels of mobility. Site fidelity, the return to, and reuse of, a previously occupied location (Switzer 1993), has been noted in a number of oceanic and migratory sharks including white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) (Klimley & Nelson 1984;Domeier & Nasby-Lucas 2007;Weng et al 2008) and is likely to have important impacts on the spatial dynamics of their populations. The causes and consequences of individual movement behaviour in the open ocean remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zebra sharks are considered nocturnal feeders (Compagno 2002), and formation of groups that take refuge in a small core area during daylight hours, then disperse for foraging in larger areas at dusk and night, is common in sharks (Klimley & Nelson 1984, Economakis & Lobel 1998, Sims et al 2005. This group formation may be an anti-predatory tactic while resting (Semeniuk & Dill 2005); it may facilitate social interaction and/or the location may act as a geographic landmark from which to forage (Klimley & Nelson 1984). Further research including localised movement, diet analyses and analysis of the reproductive cycle and mating is required to understand the function of this aggregation.…”
Section: Population Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%