2002
DOI: 10.3354/meps244219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diel and habitat-dependent resource utilisation of deep-sea fishes at the Great Meteor seamount (subtropical NE Atlantic): niche overlap and support for the sound-scattering layer-interception hypothesis

Abstract: (1) primarily pelagic food utilisation for bentho-pelagic fishes; (2) increased habitat-dependent utilisation rates at locations of interception with the sound-scattering layer; (3) diel changes in utilisation rates due to availability of prey; (4) sufficient resource partitioning among species in order to avoid competitive exclusion.KEY WORDS: Permutation test · Hutchinson's rule · Sound-scattering layer · Bentho-pelagic fishes · SeamountsResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine the relative importance of food items, the frequency of occurrence of each prey item i (%F i ), its percentage by weight (%W), and its percentage by number (%N) was calculated (Hyslop 1980, Amundsen et al 1996.%F i was calculated as the number of stomachs with Prey Item i compared to all nonempty stomachs; %W was calculated as the weight of Prey Item i compared to the total weight of all prey items; %N was calculated as the number of Prey Item i compared to the total number of all prey items (Hyslop 1980, Fock et al 2002a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In order to determine the relative importance of food items, the frequency of occurrence of each prey item i (%F i ), its percentage by weight (%W), and its percentage by number (%N) was calculated (Hyslop 1980, Amundsen et al 1996.%F i was calculated as the number of stomachs with Prey Item i compared to all nonempty stomachs; %W was calculated as the weight of Prey Item i compared to the total weight of all prey items; %N was calculated as the number of Prey Item i compared to the total number of all prey items (Hyslop 1980, Fock et al 2002a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to studies on the fish communities at the GMS (e.g. Uiblein et al 1999, Fock et al 2002a, studies on the parasite fauna and the feeding behaviour of fishes around the GMS are almost completely lacking (Ehrich 1971, Palm & Schröder 2001. Because seamounts are more difficult to study than shallow coastal marine ecosystems, less is known about the biology of their resident species and the overall system ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whether this occurs or not depends on the depth of the seamount summit with respect to the depths over which the deep scattering layers (DSL) of plankton migrate, as well as on the intensity of horizontal currents that advect the DSL over the seamount at night. Studies of fish populations over seamounts have shown that the fish prey on the migrating zooplankton and may be concentrated around the margins of the summit in order to maximise chances of encountering the zooplankton (Rogers, 1994;Fock et al, 2002). These mechanisms may also be important in the nutrition of abundant benthic communities on seamounts.…”
Section: Seamounts: Topographic Enhanced Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%