2004
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-822795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die zementfreie modulare MRP-Hüftrevisionsschaftendoprothese im „klinischen Follow-up”

Abstract: The "MRP-TITANIUM modular revision prostheses" has proved to be reliable in cases of revision surgery with extensive bony defects. The failure rate was 2.1 % for 48 prospectively examined prostheses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of survival according to Kaplan-Meier for the MRP-TITAN stem came to 97% (standard deviation ± 7%) after 9 years. There was no evidence of osteolysis arising from abrasion or proximal osteopenia resulting from insufficient loading in any patient [10].…”
Section: Figures 15a To 15cmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The probability of survival according to Kaplan-Meier for the MRP-TITAN stem came to 97% (standard deviation ± 7%) after 9 years. There was no evidence of osteolysis arising from abrasion or proximal osteopenia resulting from insufficient loading in any patient [10].…”
Section: Figures 15a To 15cmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Die Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit nach Kaplan-Meier für den MRP-TITAN-Schaft lag bei 97% (Standardabweichung ± 7%) nach 9 Jahren. Auf Reibverschleiß basierende Osteolysen sowie eine proximale Osteopenie infolge knöcherner Minderbelastung waren bei keinem Patienten nachweisbar [10]. periprosthetic fracture (supracondylar femoral fracture after falling off a bicycle), internal fixation was performed without replacement of the in situ stable MRP revision stem.…”
Section: Figures 15a To 15cunclassified
“…In complex revision surgery the advantages of stem modularity are the greater variability for restoration of the leg length, femoral offset, femoral anteversion and soft tissue tension [2,3]. The proper reconstruction of the anatomic centre of rotation and press-fit bone fixation of the revision stem are essential for long-term outcome [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) has excellent short-and longterm results in a number of studies, with low mechanical failure rates and high overall survival rates. Most of the reports with higher patient numbers are multicentre-designed, have different exclusion criteria and use different stem lengths with or without additional distal fixation [3,5,6]. Because of these shortcomings, we investigated the clinical and radiological outcomes, of femoral revision arthroplasty with the 200-mm curved MRP-TITAN stem in a retrospective, monocentric and consecutive study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of survival according to KaplanMeier for the MRP-TITAN stem came to 97% (standard deviation ± 7%) after 9 years. There was no evidence of osteolysis arising from abrasion or proximal osteopenia resulting from insufficient loading in any patient [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%