2002
DOI: 10.1515/zstw.2002.114.1.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Verwertung im Ausland gewonnener Beweismittel im deutschen Strafverfahren

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44 The main problem is in regard to the standards that should be applied in such a case in order to introduce the evidence into a German criminal proceeding. The courts have clarified that, for the collection of the evidence, the standards of the country in which the interrogation or the coercive measures take place are relevant (BGH NStZ 1994, 595;BGH NStZ 1992, 394; see also Böse 2002;Schuster 2006: 84). Hence German courts will examine in a case if the foreign standards have been observed while the evidence was collected (BGH NStZ 1992, 394;BGH NStZ 1983, 181).…”
Section: Evidence Collected Abroadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…44 The main problem is in regard to the standards that should be applied in such a case in order to introduce the evidence into a German criminal proceeding. The courts have clarified that, for the collection of the evidence, the standards of the country in which the interrogation or the coercive measures take place are relevant (BGH NStZ 1994, 595;BGH NStZ 1992, 394; see also Böse 2002;Schuster 2006: 84). Hence German courts will examine in a case if the foreign standards have been observed while the evidence was collected (BGH NStZ 1992, 394;BGH NStZ 1983, 181).…”
Section: Evidence Collected Abroadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final question of admissibility is answered according to German law (BGH NStZ 1996, 609;Böse 2002). Therefore the illegal collection of evidence does not necessarily mean that the evidence is not allowed in court.…”
Section: Evidence Collected Abroadmentioning
confidence: 99%