1985
DOI: 10.14315/evth-1985-0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Versuchung Jesu im Matthäusevangelium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the side of submission is the 32 It has become usual to look at Q as the source for the temptation in Matthew; see e.g. Stegemann (1985). Comparison with Luke 4:1-13 reveals how much Matthew has shaped the story to his own purposes, including the ordering of the temptations; for some, this indicates Matthean independence from Q (Wilkens, 1982), who detect a Matthean creation of a scribal dispute modelled on the desert temptations of Israel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the side of submission is the 32 It has become usual to look at Q as the source for the temptation in Matthew; see e.g. Stegemann (1985). Comparison with Luke 4:1-13 reveals how much Matthew has shaped the story to his own purposes, including the ordering of the temptations; for some, this indicates Matthean independence from Q (Wilkens, 1982), who detect a Matthean creation of a scribal dispute modelled on the desert temptations of Israel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%