Die Testgütekriterien des “Family Assessment Measure” (FAM — Version III)

Cierpka, Manfred; Rabin, R.; Schulz, H.

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-71841-0_5

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some of the patients are assessed at the end of the waiting period prior to therapy, and all again 1 month, 1 year and 2 years after termination of the therapy. The data col lected comprise standard diagnostics including an in ventory of complaints (B-L) [7], the Freiburg Person ality Inventory [8], disorder-specific diagnostics with the above-mentioned interview and a questionnaire on eating behavior (EAT-EDI-ANIS) [9][10][11], a de pression scale (D-S) [12], and treatment-specific di mensions such as the Family Assessment Measure [ 13,14], Major changes were expected for the inpa tient group with regard to affective experience. In the systemic treatment group we felt that changes would affect primarily cognitive dimensions and the percep tion of significant others including the family.…”

Section: Patients Indications Measuring Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Therapy Outcome of Two Treatment Models for Bulimia nervosa: Preliminary Results of a Controlled Study

Liedtke¹,

Jäger²,

Lempa³

et al. 1991

Psychother Psychosom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Beyond the reduction of the core symptoms, different modification patterns are expected due to differing emphases in two alternative types of treatment for bulimia nervosa: inpatient analytic and outpatient systemic therapy. The initial results of a study with a waiting-list control group are reported. Eating disorders of the bulimic women definitely improved in both therapy groups, the results for the inpatient group (n = 27) indicate a basic change in the attitude towards eating.

show abstract

Section: Patients Indications Measuring Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Therapy Outcome of Two Treatment Models for Bulimia nervosa: Preliminary Results of a Controlled Study

Liedtke¹,

Jäger²,

Lempa³

et al. 1991

Psychother Psychosom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Psvchotheraw and bulimia nervosa: eviluation and long‐term follow‐up of two conflict‐orientated treatment conditions

Jäger

Liedtke²,

Künsebeck

et al. 1996

Acta Psychiatr Scand

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analytic in-patient therapy (n = 32) and systemic out-patient therapy (n = 39) were applied to patients with bulimia nervosa, and the effects were evaluated 14, 26 and 38 months after the start of the treatments. Our assumptions about the general efficacy of both conflict-orientated techniques were confirmed: both therapies satisfactorily reduced the symptomatic behaviour, as well as secondary factors related to bulimia nervosa, in the long term. However, we could not identify differential effects of the two treatment regimes, which we had expected with regard to the very different therapeutic approaches. The similarities of outcome of both therapies predominate, with slightly better results in the case of the analytic in-patient treatment. The results are discussed with regard to the assumption that specific healing factors are involved in conflict-orientated treatments in addition to the "common factors' of psychotherapy.

show abstract

Die Testgütekriterien des “Family Assessment Measure” (FAM — Version III)

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Therapy Outcome of Two Treatment Models for Bulimia nervosa: Preliminary Results of a Controlled Study

Therapy Outcome of Two Treatment Models for Bulimia nervosa: Preliminary Results of a Controlled Study

Psvchotheraw and bulimia nervosa: eviluation and long‐term follow‐up of two conflict‐orientated treatment conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About