1973
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(73)90121-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die swell in elastic and viscous fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
18
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To explain this discrepancy, Donnelly and Weinberger 5 proposed the effect of die swell. The magnitude of die swell, which has been numerically predicted by Nickell et al 11 and measured by Batchelor et al, 12 corresponds to a diameter increase of 13% to 13.5%. This translates into a speed at the point of maximum die swell approximately 29% below the average speed at the die exit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To explain this discrepancy, Donnelly and Weinberger 5 proposed the effect of die swell. The magnitude of die swell, which has been numerically predicted by Nickell et al 11 and measured by Batchelor et al, 12 corresponds to a diameter increase of 13% to 13.5%. This translates into a speed at the point of maximum die swell approximately 29% below the average speed at the die exit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, two sets of values between 17.2 and 22.2 bracket the prediction of 20.21. Furthermore, when Batchelor et al 12 examined the die swell effect experimentally, gravitational effect was avoided by extruding a Newtonian fluid into a bath of liquid with matching density. The numerical prediction of Nickell et al 11 also neglected the effect of gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that higher dope ow rates inside the spinneret resulted in hollow ber membranes with smaller pore sizes and denser skin layers due to the enhanced molecular orientation. Batchelor et al [6] studied die swell experimentally on elastic liquid and Newtonian liquid of similar viscosity. The Reynolds number was about 10 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Concerning Newtonian fluids, the value of the contraction/expansion ratio was found by most of the researchers to be approximately 1.12-1.13 for creeping flow, 13 which is in good agreement with experimental results. 7,14,15 Generally, studies on thin-film flow involve either gravity-or surface-tension-driven flow. 16,17 The flow of a falling film on an inclined or vertical wall is particularly emphasized in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%