Politische Theorien Der Gegenwart 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-97432-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die politische Theorie der Deliberation: Jürgen Habermas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the flow of arguments is only one out of two preconditions for the evolution of argumentation as the structure of interaction and consensual outcomes. While the normative discourse theory regards access and voice as important variables, furthering discourse (Habermas 1976;1985;Schaal & Strecker 1999), it overlooks the other side of the coin. A high number of participants increase the heterogeneity among the actors.…”
Section: The Differential Impact Of Institutional Variables In Imentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the flow of arguments is only one out of two preconditions for the evolution of argumentation as the structure of interaction and consensual outcomes. While the normative discourse theory regards access and voice as important variables, furthering discourse (Habermas 1976;1985;Schaal & Strecker 1999), it overlooks the other side of the coin. A high number of participants increase the heterogeneity among the actors.…”
Section: The Differential Impact Of Institutional Variables In Imentioning
confidence: 97%
“…6. The Habermasian discourse theory aims at the development of propositions about ideal decisionmaking procedures for modern societies, as procedures allowing for deliberation and thus for legitimate outcomes (Habermas 1983;Schaal & Strecker 1999).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%