1936
DOI: 10.1007/bf02147637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Physiologische Erklärung des Verhaltens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even animals are driven crazy by his experiments that disrespect their animal dignity, while the limited set of responses that defines their laboratory situation says little about the repertoire they develop in their "normal" ecological niche (Buytendijk & Plessner, 1936;de Waal, 2016). Simon nicely demonstrated the benefit of individual learning processes, clarifying how the tediousness of human learning may be the outcome of an optimization strategy in view of the unfathomable complexity of human society.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even animals are driven crazy by his experiments that disrespect their animal dignity, while the limited set of responses that defines their laboratory situation says little about the repertoire they develop in their "normal" ecological niche (Buytendijk & Plessner, 1936;de Waal, 2016). Simon nicely demonstrated the benefit of individual learning processes, clarifying how the tediousness of human learning may be the outcome of an optimization strategy in view of the unfathomable complexity of human society.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction with reference to Buytendijk and Plessner (1936), such standardisation of methods limits the degree to which subject matter can appear in ways that are unforeseen, surprising, and hitherto unrecognised. If properties are pre-defined and methods standardised, the subject matter is knowable as being characterised by exactly those pre-defined properties, expressed within the boundaries of that design.…”
Section: Method-driven Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Dwelling on Pavlov's report of the two dogs for whom repeated conditioning experiments led to their entering into a hypnotic stupor, Buytendijk and Plessner (1936) conclude that his research on conditioning is far more informative about the genesis of neurosis than any non-pathological phenomena.…”
Section: The Criticisms Of Reflexologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As shown by Sherrington (1906), the "receptive field" of the scratch reflex in dogs-the area on the skin in which a stimulus can elicit the scratching movement of the leg-varies from day to day, in terms both of its location and the kind of response elicited. Regarding the conditioned reflex of Pavlov, Merleau-Ponty (1942/1967, following Buytendijk and Plessner (1936), argues that it is too unstable to do the theoretical work required of it. A striking case of instability comes from Pavlov's reports of the behaviour of two dogs who had been subjected to repeated conditioning experiments.…”
Section: The Criticisms Of Reflexologymentioning
confidence: 99%