1887
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.4635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten, insbesondere den Nutzpflanzen, unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher hervorragender Fachgelehrten begründet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
165
1
11

Year Published

1914
1914
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
165
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Sprengel (1817), Reichenbach (1828), Greville & Hooker (1831), and Kunze (1834) included all species of Selaginella in Lycopodium L. (Lycopodiaceae). The infrageneric classification of Selaginella has been notoriously contentious (Spring, 1840(Spring, , 1850Baker, 1883Baker, , 1884Baker, , 1885Baker, , 1887Kuntze, 1891;Warburg, 1900;Hieronymus & Sadebeck, 1902;Walton & Alston, 1938;Rothmaler, 1944;Tryon & Tryon, 1982;Jermy, 1986Jermy, , 1990Kung, 1988;Soják, 1993;Tzvelev, 2004;Weakley, 2012). The first comprehensive infrageneric classification that included plants now treated as Selaginella was conducted by Greville & Hooker (1831) who divided Lycopodium …”
Section: Infrageneric Taxonomic Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sprengel (1817), Reichenbach (1828), Greville & Hooker (1831), and Kunze (1834) included all species of Selaginella in Lycopodium L. (Lycopodiaceae). The infrageneric classification of Selaginella has been notoriously contentious (Spring, 1840(Spring, , 1850Baker, 1883Baker, , 1884Baker, , 1885Baker, , 1887Kuntze, 1891;Warburg, 1900;Hieronymus & Sadebeck, 1902;Walton & Alston, 1938;Rothmaler, 1944;Tryon & Tryon, 1982;Jermy, 1986Jermy, , 1990Kung, 1988;Soják, 1993;Tzvelev, 2004;Weakley, 2012). The first comprehensive infrageneric classification that included plants now treated as Selaginella was conducted by Greville & Hooker (1831) who divided Lycopodium …”
Section: Infrageneric Taxonomic Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Vij and Sachdeva (1974) shown a gross similarity of the pollen grain characteristics of the different species of Ipomoea and according to them, the dissimilarities whatsoever met in the different subgenera are as much as met within the same subgenus. All this data warrants against the segregation of Ipomea into smaller genera with poorly defined limits as done by Engler and Prantl (1897).…”
Section: Ipomoea Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A identificação do material foi realizada com base nos trabalhos de Cowan & Smith (1973), Albuquerque (1976) e Engler (18741931), utilizando-se os sinônimos mais recentes e o conceito de Pirani (1999) para Zanthoxylum. O gênero Esenbeckia foi baseado na revisão de Kaastra (1982).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Contudo, para as espécies monoclamídeas, a polêmica baseava-se na estrutura do perianto, se sépala ou pétala. Assim, o arranjo dos verticilos do perianto foi para Engler (1931) e Reeder & Cheo (1951) um caráter relevante para separar Zanthoxylum de Fagara. A ocorrência de espécies que exibem estrutura intermediária entre Zanthoxylum e Fagara foi mencionada por Hartley (1966) e Brizicky (1962), que consideraram Zanthoxylum uma condição derivada do tipo Fagara por aborto de algumas ou todas as sépalas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation