1969
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.19690110202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die mikroskopische Bestimmung der Größenverteilung von Kugelelementen, die zufällig in gewisser Umwelt verstreut sind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…--In the following paragraph, we saw that the image distribution obtained experimentally is identical to the one derived with our model and also to the one given by Lodin et al [8], Bach [1], and Komenda et al [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…--In the following paragraph, we saw that the image distribution obtained experimentally is identical to the one derived with our model and also to the one given by Lodin et al [8], Bach [1], and Komenda et al [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The final equation was found to be mathematically identical to the one derived by Lodin et al [8], Bach [1], and Komenda et al [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first analytical solution for T = 0 and no truncation was published by Wicksell (1925), and the last one so far, with T > 0, overprojection and truncation, is that of Coleman (1980Coleman ( , 1982. Among the many papers in between, we can mention those of Reid (1955), Santalo (1955, Bach (1963, Goldsmith (1967), Sidak (1968), Komenda et al (1969) and Tallis (1970). Only Bach (1963) seems to deal with overprojection and truncation (in the form of a positive resolution threshold) simultaneously.…”
Section: Distribution-free Analytic Approuchmentioning
confidence: 99%