1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf02422676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die magnetischen Eigenschaften der Europium-Chalkogenide unter hydrostatischem Druck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 we can observe in all our samples the presence of a welldefined magnetic transition at about 11 K. This transition, taking into account the presence of spinodal decompositions with high Eu content, is most probably the paramagnet-antiferromagnet phase transition known for EuTe [10]. The Néel temperature, T N , estimated for our samples equals to 11 K, a value slightly higher than that for EuTe, where T N = 9.58 K [10]. It is therefore highly probable that the Ge 1−x Eu x Te spinodal decompositions with 0.15 < x < 0.35 show antiferromagnetism due to superexchange magnetic interactions.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…3 we can observe in all our samples the presence of a welldefined magnetic transition at about 11 K. This transition, taking into account the presence of spinodal decompositions with high Eu content, is most probably the paramagnet-antiferromagnet phase transition known for EuTe [10]. The Néel temperature, T N , estimated for our samples equals to 11 K, a value slightly higher than that for EuTe, where T N = 9.58 K [10]. It is therefore highly probable that the Ge 1−x Eu x Te spinodal decompositions with 0.15 < x < 0.35 show antiferromagnetism due to superexchange magnetic interactions.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Therefore, we suppose that this transition is related to the presence of EuTe clusters in our samples. The estimated values of the Néel temperature, T N , for the three mentioned samples are close to 11 K, a value slightly higher than that for EuTe bulk crystals with T N =9.58 K [18]. The values of the magnetic susceptibility roughly correspond to the susceptibility due to the chemical amount of Eu in the samples.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This is clearly demonstrated for the sulfide with x = 0.1, which is practically identical to EuS [9]. An opposite behavior is found for the selenide which exhibits a sharp tip as typical for an antiferromagnet (9]. For the sulfide with x = 0.2 we find no clear-cut behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…From the initial susceptibility one can determine the type of magnetic ordering and the ordering temperature Tc or TN' Because of the demagnetizing field and the appearance of magnetic domains at Tc a classical ferromagnet will yield a sharp kink at Tc and the initial susceptibility will remain constant below Tc. This is clearly demonstrated for the sulfide with x = 0.1, which is practically identical to EuS [9]. An opposite behavior is found for the selenide which exhibits a sharp tip as typical for an antiferromagnet (9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%