1950
DOI: 10.1007/bf02026796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Lichtstrahlkrümmung in Bodennähe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1950
1950
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It vanishes for a temperature gradient of -3. 42°C/l00 m [Brocks, 1950]. For higher values, K becomes negative, that is, the light ray will be bent concavely upward, opposite to the curvature of the surface of the earth.…”
Section: Refraction In a Plane Stratified Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It vanishes for a temperature gradient of -3. 42°C/l00 m [Brocks, 1950]. For higher values, K becomes negative, that is, the light ray will be bent concavely upward, opposite to the curvature of the surface of the earth.…”
Section: Refraction In a Plane Stratified Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve values of about 200 prad for r, which is roughly ten times the estimated standard error of r, the instrument heights (and thus also 5) were chosen as 1.0 to 1.2 m. This r value was estimated using the tables of Brocks (1950), for which the required input information are the length of sight line, the observation time, and the expected weather conditions at the time of the experiment. The actual average height above the ground h was determined by conventional surveying methods as 1.16 m in the field.…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] In geodesy, the coefficient of refraction k represents a common way to quantify terrestrial refraction. It may be defined as the ratio of the radius of the Earth R and the radius of the line of sight r, i.e., the radius of a circular arc used as a mathematical model to approximate a complex curved path of light [e.g., Brocks, 1950a;Kahmen and Faig, 1988]. On the basis of reciprocal vertical angle measurements near Hannover (Germany), Carl Friedrich Gauss found an average value of the refraction coefficient k of approximately +0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] The Gaussian refraction coefficient, though often suitable to describe refraction effects well above the ground, is not representative for the lower atmosphere [e.g., Brocks, 1950aBrocks, , 1950bBomford, 1980]. This region involves the surface layers to a height of about 30 m [Webb, 1984] and, importantly, includes the near-ground domain in which optical geodetic measurements are often carried out (e.g., geometric levelling in general and trigonometrical heighting in flatter regions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation