2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die-less Rapid Prototyping Process: Parametric Investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the forming of a sheet requires fewer forming and bending forces. Similar results to improve geometric accuracy were reported by (Desai et al , 2014; Mohammadi et al , 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, the forming of a sheet requires fewer forming and bending forces. Similar results to improve geometric accuracy were reported by (Desai et al , 2014; Mohammadi et al , 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Very low stepdown values, as could be used to obtain a semi-polished surface finish, typically lead to cyclic loading of the sheet surface and, depending on the material being processed, can result in early failure due to fatigue phenomena. Numerous studies have been carried out that have attempted to quantify the influences and sensitivities of specific process parameters through means of an empirical and/or analytical Design Of Experiments (DOE), often accompanied by an ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA) (Leon et 2013, Desai et al 2014, Sarraji et al 2012, Bahloul et al 2014, Jeswiet, Hagan et al 2002. While the specific sensitivities appear to be dependent on the experimental setup, general trends have been noted and are consistent with what has already been stated.…”
Section: Non-compensated Contouringmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For a given tool path strategy and wall angle, the quality of part produce from SPIF process depends upon above mentioned parameters. The researchers generally investigate the responses such as geometrical accuracy, surface finish [5] and thinning in the formed part. It has been observed that as the wall angle increases the thinning of the blank increases [2].…”
Section: Fig 1 Schematic Of Single Point Incremental Forming (Spif) mentioning
confidence: 99%